지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Recently, with the rise of China and its expansionism to Asia, the constant tensions and conflicts between China and overseas Chinese political communities such as Singapore, Hong Kong, and Taiwan have emerged. This comtemporary international political issues offer meaningful implications to some researchers who are interested in the Asian studies, especially overseas Chinese and its diaspora. The aim of this paper is to introduce diverse analysis of these researchers on overseas Chinese studies to the Korean scholarly environment, which has not been familar with this topic.
Two of most general tendency among the overseas Chinese studies can be observed in the debates on the characteristics of the overseas Chinese community. As Wang Gung-wu implies in his pioneer researches, Chinese communities in the mainland China and the overseas Chinese communities in Southeast Asia both has shared something like common traditional values, so called “Chineseness”. On the other hand, Adam McKeown criticizes this kind of China-centered perspective and suggests an alternative approach, “Diasporic Nationalism”, which regards overseas Chinese communities in the world as an independent subject against ‘home country’-‘host country’ discourse. The problem of these two perspectives on the overseas Chinese communities is that these researches – despite of their collisions – fundamentally have a common premise, ‘every overseas Chinese community shares the same homogeneity’. This premise could not describe the entire overseas Chinese communities in the globe including Southeast Asia. In this regard, the “ecological differences” that is proposed by Philip Kuhn could be an appropriate concept to study overseas Chinese communities, because it emphasizes the diversity of studying overseas Chinese history regardless of any other theoretical framework.
The ‘ecological differences’, as a research approach in understanding overseas Chinese community, carries a proper way of facing the coming resurrection of Chinese ‘Empire’. To understand the diverse dimensions of conflicts between the Chinese expansionism and the overseas Chinese politico-socio-cultural communities including Singapore, Hong Kong, and Taiwan, it is necessary to deal with those confrontations individually because Singapore, Hong Kong, and Taiwan have been rested on the different ecological environments from each other.
Two of most general tendency among the overseas Chinese studies can be observed in the debates on the characteristics of the overseas Chinese community. As Wang Gung-wu implies in his pioneer researches, Chinese communities in the mainland China and the overseas Chinese communities in Southeast Asia both has shared something like common traditional values, so called “Chineseness”. On the other hand, Adam McKeown criticizes this kind of China-centered perspective and suggests an alternative approach, “Diasporic Nationalism”, which regards overseas Chinese communities in the world as an independent subject against ‘home country’-‘host country’ discourse. The problem of these two perspectives on the overseas Chinese communities is that these researches – despite of their collisions – fundamentally have a common premise, ‘every overseas Chinese community shares the same homogeneity’. This premise could not describe the entire overseas Chinese communities in the globe including Southeast Asia. In this regard, the “ecological differences” that is proposed by Philip Kuhn could be an appropriate concept to study overseas Chinese communities, because it emphasizes the diversity of studying overseas Chinese history regardless of any other theoretical framework.
The ‘ecological differences’, as a research approach in understanding overseas Chinese community, carries a proper way of facing the coming resurrection of Chinese ‘Empire’. To understand the diverse dimensions of conflicts between the Chinese expansionism and the overseas Chinese politico-socio-cultural communities including Singapore, Hong Kong, and Taiwan, it is necessary to deal with those confrontations individually because Singapore, Hong Kong, and Taiwan have been rested on the different ecological environments from each other.
목차
서론
Ⅰ. 민족주의적 관점과 ‘중화성’
Ⅱ. ‘중화성’과 ‘디아스포라’
Ⅲ. ‘중화성’의 다양성 : 생태적 상이성
Ⅳ. 화교 화인 디아스포라 연구의 미개척지 : 생태적 상이성과 ‘중화성’의 공존
결론
참고문헌
〈Abstract〉
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
중국의 화교화인 역사·교육·문화 네트워크 연구
재외한인연구
2015 .01
-
중국과 대만의 화교화인 교육 비교
민족연구
2015 .01
-
개혁개방 시기 베트남의 화교정책에 대한 연구
중국학논총
2024 .09
-
말레이시아 화인화문 시문학의 트랜스내셔널리즘과 문화적 정체성 연구
중어중문학
2021 .03
-
동남아시아 화교 이민사 연구 -신중국 수립 이후를 중심으로-
중국학논총
2023 .03
-
鲁迅的遗言和Chinese Characteristics
한국중어중문학회 학술대회 자료집
2015 .11
-
韓國 華僑의 韓中 코드轉換 類型과 分布 - 釜山 華僑 3세를 中心으로 -
어문연구(語文硏究)
2017 .01
-
도쿄 화교·화인의 현지 정착 실태에 관한 연구
중국학
2021 .01
-
중국 중산계층의 성장과 新華僑의 제주도 유입
역사와 세계
2016 .06
-
예비영어교사의 글로벌-다문화 역량 강화를 위한 해외 교육 프로그램 모델
영어영문학
2018 .08
-
‘재외동포기본법’ 제정에 관한 연구
재외한인연구
2022 .08
-
Research Trends of Korean Language Education Overseas in Korea
THE REVIEW OF KOREAN STUDIES
2024 .12
-
식민형 ‘중간시민’에서 동화형 ‘유사시민’으로* - 화교화인의 변모와 ‘동아시아 시민’의 형성(1) -
석당논총
2018 .01
-
1930年 前後 仁川華僑小學을 통해 본 華僑社會의 動向
중국사연구
2016 .01
-
해방 후 조선 화교들의 북한 사회 정착 과정
한국학(구 정신문화연구)
2019 .09
-
항공중국어 관련 교과목 개설 현황 및 교재 분석
인문과학연구
2018 .01
-
대학 중국어 학습자의 학습동기와 태도에 관한 연구
중국어문논총
2020 .01
-
해외 한국학 연구의 새로운 시각과 연구 지평의 확대
사림
2023 .01
-
在朝鮮 ‘中國專管租界’ 공간과 화상조직
중국지식네트워크
2022 .11
-
한국화교의 초국가주의 실천과 다중 정체성
동아인문학
2024 .09
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
왕징웨이(汪精衛) 난징국민정부시기 화교 송금시스템의 변화 : 중국 화남(華南)지역 사례연구
김종호
,
이정희
중국근현대사연구
2018
.06
개항장경제권과 근대세계체제 : 1890년대 중국 설탕시장의 변화
鄭榮九
중국근현대사연구
2017
.06
중일전쟁초기(1937~1941) 중국 및 화교 금융기업의 생존전략 : 동남아시아 화교 송금 네트워크와 中國銀行 · 中南銀行
김종호
중국근현대사연구
2016
.09
냉전시기(1950~1971) 중화민국 僑務정책의 성격과 한계 : 동남아 화교교육을 중심으로
손준식
동북아역사논총
2014
.03
箕子傳承의 형성과정 연구
오현수
한국사학보
2016
.11
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0