지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2022.12
- 수록면
- 25 - 70 (46page)
- DOI
- 10.29323/mchina.2022.12.96.25
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The May Fourth Movement is a revolutionary epoch-making event in modern Chinese history. Even 100 years later today many scholars have continued to research and reappraise. It was an intellectual revolution that advocated national independence and individual liberation, a significant turning point in modern history, a decisive moment for socialism to take root in China, and became an ideal model for enlightenment movement or political participation. In particular, democracy was a core value that penentrating the May Fourth along with science, and therefore considerable study has been conducted on the relationship between the May Fourth Movement and democratic thought. However, the overall research trends was to emphasize radicalization and disconnection. They argue that democratic discussion and practice during the May Fourth were fundamentally radical or at least moved toward radicalization. Accordingly, this paper examines democratic theory of Sun Yat-sen’s Nationalist group to find their political ideals, as well as review the mainstream of May Fourth understanding.
First of all, in the case of Sun Yat-sen, the leader of Kuomintang, he led Constitutional Protection Movement, emphasizing the restoration of National Assembly, and the establishment of parliamentary democracy. Even during the May Fourth, when mass political movement broke out, Sun repeatedly suggested complete restoration of National Assembly as an only solution to deal with political turmoil. Kuomintang theorists such as Liao Zhongkai, Zhu Zhixin, Dai Jitao, who developed Sun’s democratic theory also defended parliamentary democracy, while demanded direct civil rights like Initiative, Referendum, Recall. In other words, they aimed for moderate political reform to maintain representative democracy with introducing some elements of direct democracy. On the other hand, Nationalist group took a relatively negative attitude towards radical revolution such as Russian October Revolution. This was clearly different from the so-called people"s coalition theory(populism) or the leftist socialism that prevailed during the May Fourth. Then it can be evaluated that democratic theory of Sun Yat-sen’s Nationalist group was comparatively conservative. Similarly, they were continuous in that kept Constitutional Protection Movement, and elitist in that underestimated the political power of people.
First of all, in the case of Sun Yat-sen, the leader of Kuomintang, he led Constitutional Protection Movement, emphasizing the restoration of National Assembly, and the establishment of parliamentary democracy. Even during the May Fourth, when mass political movement broke out, Sun repeatedly suggested complete restoration of National Assembly as an only solution to deal with political turmoil. Kuomintang theorists such as Liao Zhongkai, Zhu Zhixin, Dai Jitao, who developed Sun’s democratic theory also defended parliamentary democracy, while demanded direct civil rights like Initiative, Referendum, Recall. In other words, they aimed for moderate political reform to maintain representative democracy with introducing some elements of direct democracy. On the other hand, Nationalist group took a relatively negative attitude towards radical revolution such as Russian October Revolution. This was clearly different from the so-called people"s coalition theory(populism) or the leftist socialism that prevailed during the May Fourth. Then it can be evaluated that democratic theory of Sun Yat-sen’s Nationalist group was comparatively conservative. Similarly, they were continuous in that kept Constitutional Protection Movement, and elitist in that underestimated the political power of people.
목차
Ⅰ. 머리말
Ⅱ. 孫文集團 지도자 孫文의 민권정치론
Ⅲ. 孫文集團 주요 이론가의 민권정치론
Ⅳ. 孫文集團 민권정치론의 보수적 성격
Ⅴ. 결론: 孫文集團과 오사운동 시기에 대한 재검토
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
쑨원(孫文)의 러시아 10월 혁명 인식과 국민당 개조
중국근현대사연구
2018 .12
-
영어와 한국어의 공범주 현상 비교 분석
현대영어영문학
2018 .01
-
3 · 1운동사 연구의 최근 동향과 방향성
역사와현실
2018 .12
-
중국의 국민국가 건설에서 혁명과 정치의 사이 - 이승휘 저 『손문의 혁명』 -
동양사학연구
2021 .03
-
[書評] 辛亥革命研究的拓展與深化: 評梁壽華著<<革命先驅 -基督徒與晚清中國革命的起源>> (香港: 宣道出版社, 2007)
중국사연구
2018 .01
-
영어와 한국어의 이동현상에 대한 연구
영어영문학
2018 .08
-
When can Topics be Questioned?
생성문법연구
2015 .01
-
HISTORY TEACHER’S REVIEW: WHAT DOES THE MARCH 1ST INDEPENDENCE MOVEMENT OF 1919 MEAN TO US?
Public History & Museum
2019 .12
-
1910~40년대 한국인들의 쑨원, 삼민주의 이해
역사학보
2016 .12
-
The March 1st Movement and the Red Thread of International Peace History
Korea Observer
2019 .01
-
주제화·wh-이동과 어순섞기 현상에서의 비대칭성
신영어영문학
2017 .11
-
현대 패션 윈도우 디스플레이에 나타난 키네티시즘 움직임 특성
복식문화연구
2018 .01
-
독자로서 글 쓰는 자신을 바라보다 : 성민선, 《섬세한 보릿가루처럼》(SUN, 2020)
수필미학
2020 .12
-
대의민주주의의 모순과참여민주주의에 대한 열망－1968년 프랑스 노동자 총파업과 자주경영(autogestion)－
인문과학
2018 .01
-
Achievements and Challenges in the Centennial Anniversary Studies of the March First Independence Movement
Korea Journal
2021 .03
-
5・4 계몽운동과 민족・민주주의의 형성
韓國史學史學報
2018 .01
-
일본군‘위안부’ 문제의 탈진실 정치 - 아베 정권을 중심으로
동북아역사논총
2021 .03
-
한국 근대 정치ㆍ사회단체의 ‘국민’ 만들기 - 독립협회ㆍ대한자강회ㆍ대한협회ㆍ신간회를 중심으로 -
숭실사학
2017 .01
-
五四新文化运动时期社会环境与翻译活动之影響關係硏究
중국어문논역총간
2020 .07
-
Co-governance and the Environmental Movement
Korea Journal
2021 .12
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2023-912-000313018