지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2022.11
- 수록면
- 7 - 23 (17page)
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
With the rise of online platforms, three problems have evolved: Firstly, there is a risk of platform operators abusing their usually dominant market position by the acting as gatekeepers. Secondly, and related to the first problem, platform operators are the ones determining the terms and conditions for the use of the platform by their “house rules” in a comprehensive way, reaching from content regulation to the use of personal data. Thirdly, platform reach and speed significantly increase the effects of “problematic” user behaviour, or even render such behaviour possible.
Around the world, different regulatory approaches are applied to these problems. This article presents the German approach, with a particular focus on elements of self-regulation. Starting from a localisation of the various manifestations of self-regulation in the German “regulatory toolbox”, it first discusses limitations of the use of “house rules” by platform operators, imposed not only by competition law, but also by fundamental rights which have a horizontal effect through general provisions in private law. This co-regulatory setting is contrasted with the framework generated by the Network Enforcement Act (Netzwerkdurchsetzungsgesetz, NetzDG ), which does not only provide for co-regulation in a wider understanding, but also for the (optional) creation of “bodies of regulated self-regulation”. While the success of this regulatory strategy is doubtful, a concluding brief analysis of elements of self-regulation in forthcoming EU legislation (Digital Markets Act, DMA, and Digital Services Act, DSA) shows that despite the obvious need for more state regulation there is still some room for self-regulation, particularly in the area of compliance.
Around the world, different regulatory approaches are applied to these problems. This article presents the German approach, with a particular focus on elements of self-regulation. Starting from a localisation of the various manifestations of self-regulation in the German “regulatory toolbox”, it first discusses limitations of the use of “house rules” by platform operators, imposed not only by competition law, but also by fundamental rights which have a horizontal effect through general provisions in private law. This co-regulatory setting is contrasted with the framework generated by the Network Enforcement Act (Netzwerkdurchsetzungsgesetz, NetzDG ), which does not only provide for co-regulation in a wider understanding, but also for the (optional) creation of “bodies of regulated self-regulation”. While the success of this regulatory strategy is doubtful, a concluding brief analysis of elements of self-regulation in forthcoming EU legislation (Digital Markets Act, DMA, and Digital Services Act, DSA) shows that despite the obvious need for more state regulation there is still some room for self-regulation, particularly in the area of compliance.
목차
Abstract
Ⅰ. The Rise and Problems of Online Platforms
Ⅱ. A Look into the German Regulatory Toolbox
Ⅲ. (Self-) Regulation of Online Platforms under German Law
Ⅳ. Conclusion
Bibliography
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
디지털 시대의 플랫폼과 소비자법
저스티스
2023 .02
-
Regulation of Digital Platforms in the EU and Germany
경제규제와 법
2022 .05
-
미국의 온라인 플랫폼 규제 동향과 시사점 - 미 연방하원 법제사법위원회의 디지털 경쟁 조사를 중심으로 -
외법논집
2021 .11
-
온라인 플랫폼 자율규제 방안에 관한 연구
경제규제와 법
2022 .11
-
Analysis of the Present and Future of the Korea Online Platform Regulation Using Latent Dirichlet Allocation
Global Business and Finance Review
2024 .04
-
개인 간 거래와 온라인 플랫폼의 규율 - 자율규제 관점을 중심으로 -
IT와 법연구
2024 .02
-
Proposed Changes to the U.S. Antitrust Laws - Antitrust Regulations in Digital Economy -
법학논총
2022 .09
-
Platform Business Regulation in Japan - from the Perspective of Administrative Law -
경제규제와 법
2022 .05
-
온라인 플랫폼 규제법의 구조적 모순
미국헌법연구
2024 .08
-
플랫폼 규제 입법의 쟁점에 대한 분석과 평가 – 사전지정 및 금지행위를 중심으로 -
IT와 법연구
2024 .08
-
온라인플랫폼 공정화법 제정안에 대한 검토
경쟁법연구
2021 .01
-
Platform Law in Europe - Combatting Digital Harms Through Co-Regulation -
경제규제와 법
2022 .05
-
온라인 플랫폼의 합리적 규제를 위한 바람직한 입법방안
법과 정책연구
2024 .09
-
디지털플랫폼의 거대·복합화에 따른 경쟁법적 문제
경쟁법연구
2023 .04
-
온라인 플랫폼 자율규제에 관한 시론(試論)
법조
2022 .08
-
온라인 플랫폼에 특유한 독과점 규제의 필요성 여부의 검토
정보통신정책연구
2024 .03
-
Gewährleistungsstaat und Regulierungsreform in Deutschland: From deregulation to smart regulation
법학논집
2015 .01
-
온라인플랫폼에서의 공정거래에 관한 법제 동향과 전망
경희법학
2021 .12
-
플랫폼의 시장획정과 시장지배력에 관한 쟁점
경쟁법연구
2020 .01
-
온라인 플랫폼 불공정거래행위 규제에 관한 고찰 -유럽연합과 일본 법제를 중심으로-
과학기술과 법
2021 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2023-366-000383263