지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 저널정보
- 대한외과학회 Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research Vol.104 No.3
- 발행연도
- 2023.3
- 수록면
- 137 - 143 (7page)
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Purpose: The use of absorbable skin staplers (ASS) for skin closure has been increasing due to their convenience and timesaving effect. In this study, we evaluated the effectiveness of ASS in reducing skin closure time and its safety regarding surgical site infection (SSI), comparing it to conventional hand sewing (HS) in patients who underwent mastectomy.
Methods: A single-center, retrospective study was conducted. The electronic medical records of patients who underwent mastectomy between July 2015 and June 2020 in Samsung Medical Center were reviewed. The data included previously known risk factors for SSI. We compared the time expended on skin closure and the occurrence rate of SSI between the ASS group and the HS group.
Results: We included 4,311 patients in the analysis. Among them, 520 patients were treated with ASS and 3,791 patients with HS. The average time for skin closure was 16.2 ± 10.1 minutes in the ASS group and 36.5 ± 29.0 minutes in the HS group (P < 0.001). The SSI rate was 0.38% (2 of 520) in the ASS group and 0.36% (14 of 3,791) in the HS group (P > 0.999).
Conclusion: The use of ASS in mastectomy reduced the time for skin closure significantly but did not increase the SSI. Therefore, it can be an effective and safe choice to use ASS instead of HS for skin closure in mastectomy.
Methods: A single-center, retrospective study was conducted. The electronic medical records of patients who underwent mastectomy between July 2015 and June 2020 in Samsung Medical Center were reviewed. The data included previously known risk factors for SSI. We compared the time expended on skin closure and the occurrence rate of SSI between the ASS group and the HS group.
Results: We included 4,311 patients in the analysis. Among them, 520 patients were treated with ASS and 3,791 patients with HS. The average time for skin closure was 16.2 ± 10.1 minutes in the ASS group and 36.5 ± 29.0 minutes in the HS group (P < 0.001). The SSI rate was 0.38% (2 of 520) in the ASS group and 0.36% (14 of 3,791) in the HS group (P > 0.999).
Conclusion: The use of ASS in mastectomy reduced the time for skin closure significantly but did not increase the SSI. Therefore, it can be an effective and safe choice to use ASS instead of HS for skin closure in mastectomy.
목차
INTRODUCTION
METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
The Use of Absorbable Skin Stapler in Mastectomy Does Not Increase the Rate of SSI (Surgical Site Infection)
대한외과학회 학술대회 초록집
2021 .05
-
Use of Subcuticular Absorbable Stapler for Skin Closure
대한임상종양학회 학술대회지
2017 .02
-
Safety of long-term subcutaneous free flap skin banking after skin-sparing mastectomy
Archives of plastic surgery : APS
2018 .01
-
Mastectomy in female-to-male transgender patients: A single-center 24-year retrospective analysis
Archives of plastic surgery : APS
2019 .01
-
Robotic Mastectomy
대한외과학회 학술대회 초록집
2018 .11
-
Robotic Mastectomy
대한임상종양학회 학술대회지
2018 .02
-
Best Breast Reconstruction Begins with Best Mastectomy combined with Nipple Sparing Mastectomy (NSM) -Comparison of clinical outcome of one- and two-stage reconstruction after skin/nipple sparing mastectomy in patients with breast cancer -
대한외과학회 학술대회 초록집
2019 .10
-
Purse-String Skin Closure Versus Linear Conventional Skin Closure in Stoma Reversal : A single-center experience
대한외과학회 학술대회 초록집
2019 .10
-
Clinical Trial on the Incidence of Wound Infection and Patient Satisfaction After Stoma Closure: Comparison of Two Skin Closure Techniques
Annals of Coloproctology
2015 .01
-
Perceptions of Prophylactic Mastectomy in Korea
Archives of plastic surgery : APS
2016 .01
-
Comparison of operative outcomes (including depressed postoperative skin scar incidences) between Conventional Linear Skin Closure versus Purse-string Skin Closure in Ileostomy Reversal
대한외과학회 학술대회 초록집
2019 .10
-
Oncological safety of sparing the Skin/Nipple in mastectomy
대한외과학회 학술대회 초록집
2016 .11
-
Are the Outcomes of Breast Conservation Surgery Inferior to Those of Mastectomy in Patients with Stage II-IIIA Triple-Negative Breast Cancer?
Journal of Breast Disease
2021 .12
-
Can Skin Adhesive Be Applied to Skin Closure after Single Port Laparoscopic Appendectomy?
대한외과학회 학술대회 초록집
2021 .11
-
Breast Conservation Therapy versus Mastectomy in Patients with T1-2N1 Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: Pooled Analysis of KROG 14-18 and 14-23
Cancer Research and Treatment
2018 .01
-
Surgical skin adhesive bond is safe and feasible wound closure method to reduce surgical site infection following minimally invasive colorectal cancer surgery
Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research
2020 .09
-
A New Skin Graft Donor Site Using the Abdominal Dog-Ear Deformity in Mastectomy Flap Necrosis
Archives of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery
2018 .01
-
Skin-sparing Mastectomy and Immediate Nipple Graft for Large, Ptotic Breast
Journal of Breast Cancer
2019 .01
-
Skin Corrosion and Irritation Test of Nanoparticles Using Reconstructed Three-Dimensional Human Skin Model, EpiDermTM
Toxicological Research
2016 .10
-
Development of Robotic Mastectomy Using a Single-Port Surgical Robot System
Journal of Breast Cancer
2020 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2023-514-000430025