메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
김상태 (순천향대학교) 어연 (순천향대학교)
저널정보
한양법학회 한양법학 한양법학 제34권 제1집(통권 제81집)
발행연도
2023.2
수록면
3 - 30 (28page)
DOI
10.35227/HYLR.2023.2.34.1.3

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
In Korea, regulations on games are strengthened by a negative perspective, such as overindulgence, despite their value as a recreational culture and their industrial value. Attention is paid only to the negative aspects of games, while the effects of the game industry on the national economy and the characteristics and positive functions of games are disregarded. In addition, regulations themselves are pursued instead of seeking fundamental and rational resolutions based on the analysis of causes. This can be seen as a problem. Even when the need for regulations on games is accepted, efforts should be made to minimize the negative effects of such regulations. For these reasons, this study suggests the following as considerations in reforming current game regulations. First, game regulations should be allowed only to the extent they do not infringe the freedom to use games. In other words, the enactment of game regulations should be within the limits of restricting fundamental rights, such as the principle of proportionality. Second, on the one hand, a regulation system should be strengthened to maintain public welfare and order by supplementing defects of necessary regulations; on the other hand, unnecessary and unreasonable regulations should be modified to promote autonomy and creativity in social and economic activities, improve the quality of life for the people, and constantly enhance national competitiveness. Third, if administrative rules are abused, the rule of law and the principle of the legality of administration would be put at great risk and administrative rules could be used as a basis for the so called ‘shadow regulations.’ Therefore, it is desirable that major content of regulations is regulated by laws to improve the expertise and consistency in game regulations. Fourth, in a bid to promote the game industry, it is necessary to depart from ex ante regulations, which restrict rights or impose obligations beforehand, and consider with priority ex-post regulations, which restrict rights or impose obligations after the fact as necessary. Fifth, it is necessary to consider cost-incurring factors resulting from regulations through cost-benefit analysis. Regulations must use the most effective means to achieve a goal, and a means should be used to achieve the highest goal. Sixth, it would reasonable to have the Ministry of Culture, Sports and Tourism get the jurisdiction of the regulations to secure the consistency and unity of regulations.

목차

Ⅰ. 들어가며
Ⅱ. 게임산업에서의 규제의 현황과 평가
Ⅲ. 게임산업에서의 규제개혁을 위한 법정책적 제언
Ⅳ. 마치며
참고문헌
Abstract

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0