지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 연구보고서
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2016.2
- 수록면
- 1 - 102 (102page)
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Water regulation is quite diverse, relevant to water resource development, water use, drinking water source protection, and watershed management in Korea. Paldang reservoir in Gyeonggi Province is the only and unique drinking water resources for Seoul Metropolitan Area. This situation led much stronger site and operational regulations upon its related watershed compared to other area. It is used to be regarded as mandatory and compulsory duty in the past, but changing to the mediated subject with stakeholder’s demand recently. Government should consider achieving policy objectives and the effectiveness of regulation quality, simultaneously. This study made a list of the existing water regulations primarily, finding out ten major water law and 270 regulations in national level. Among them, 44% are social regulations, 35% administrative and 21% economic ones. Most of them applies to local level, so that local government should recognize the related problems for enforcing proper improvement or reform.
Some countries had began regulatory reform for better regulation and advanced to smart regulation and even more to regulatory governance status. The transition was based on the societal needs and change. Better Regulation Task Force in U.K., BRTF, suggested basic 5 principles of good regulation, such as proportionality, accountability, consistency, transparency, targeting to achieve fair, effective, affordable regulations in 1997 already. Korean Ministry of Environment announced that integrated regulation system will be enforced near future for better regulation in environmental sectors. They set a short and long term goal to try the regulatory reform after their impact assessment soon.
There are constant demands for deregulation to balance between an efficient environmental protection and less restriction of economic productivity in Korea. Some or partial deregulation applied to alleviate suffering due to poorly designed or overly complicated ones. However, we had no attempt to assess the existing regulation itself based on proper principles. To do this, we need to make water regulation inventory first, including its contents and history. Regulations we listed in this study can be the tentative catalogue for future inventory. After compiling inventory, we can transit to the next assessment phase. Operational regulation, such as non-point source control measures, should be the main target for evaluation, since a lot of actual cases causing distrust the water regulation. In this step, we need our own principles, which can be a useful toolkit for measuring and improving the regulation’s quality and its enforcement process. We suggested 5 principles of better regulation including proportionality suggested by UK, communication competence, acceptance, compliance, and administrative capability. Principles we suggested can be the first link to integrated management and also the initial step for regulation impact assessment. They should be re-examined with stakeholder survey or satisfaction questionnaire for actual implication in the future. We expect more discussions and trials for better regulation for good deregulation and regulation reform about to start.
Some countries had began regulatory reform for better regulation and advanced to smart regulation and even more to regulatory governance status. The transition was based on the societal needs and change. Better Regulation Task Force in U.K., BRTF, suggested basic 5 principles of good regulation, such as proportionality, accountability, consistency, transparency, targeting to achieve fair, effective, affordable regulations in 1997 already. Korean Ministry of Environment announced that integrated regulation system will be enforced near future for better regulation in environmental sectors. They set a short and long term goal to try the regulatory reform after their impact assessment soon.
There are constant demands for deregulation to balance between an efficient environmental protection and less restriction of economic productivity in Korea. Some or partial deregulation applied to alleviate suffering due to poorly designed or overly complicated ones. However, we had no attempt to assess the existing regulation itself based on proper principles. To do this, we need to make water regulation inventory first, including its contents and history. Regulations we listed in this study can be the tentative catalogue for future inventory. After compiling inventory, we can transit to the next assessment phase. Operational regulation, such as non-point source control measures, should be the main target for evaluation, since a lot of actual cases causing distrust the water regulation. In this step, we need our own principles, which can be a useful toolkit for measuring and improving the regulation’s quality and its enforcement process. We suggested 5 principles of better regulation including proportionality suggested by UK, communication competence, acceptance, compliance, and administrative capability. Principles we suggested can be the first link to integrated management and also the initial step for regulation impact assessment. They should be re-examined with stakeholder survey or satisfaction questionnaire for actual implication in the future. We expect more discussions and trials for better regulation for good deregulation and regulation reform about to start.
목차
[표지]
[연구요약]
[차례]
표차례
그림차례
[제1장 서론]
제1절 연구 배경 및 목적
제2절 연구 범위 및 방법
[제2장 경기도 물 관련 규제 현황]
제1절 국내 환경 관련 규제 현황과 변화 추이
제2절 경기도와 물 관련 규제
[제3장 경기도 물 관련 규제 분류 및 인벤토리 작성]
제1절 분야별 규제와 인벤토리 작성
제2절 경기도 물 관련 규제 실효성 사례 검토
제3절 미래 물 관리를 위한 물 환경 규제 개선 방향
[제4장 결론]
제1절 결론
제2절 정책제언
[참고문헌]
[Abstract]
[부록]
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
Gewährleistungsstaat und Regulierungsreform in Deutschland: From deregulation to smart regulation
법학논집
2015 .01
-
스포츠법상 규제에 대한 현대적 변화
공법학연구
2018 .11
-
게임산업 활성화를 위한 법정책적 연구
한양법학
2023 .02
-
온라인 플랫폼과 자율규제 논의의 기초
경제규제와 법
2022 .11
-
Community design regulation
[KIIP] 한국지식재산연구원 도서DB
2015 .12
-
간접규제로 바라본 온라인게임 결제한도 제한 -Lessig와 Sunstein의 간접규제사고를 기초로 하여-
일감법학
2019 .01
-
AI 위험인식이 규제 유형 선호에 미치는 영향에 관한 탐색적 연구: 머신러닝 방법을 통한 탐색
지방정부연구
2024 .08
-
現代國家의 規律構造와 規制된 自律規制 ― 특히 규제거버넌스의 구축과 실현방안을 중심으로 ―
공법연구
2018 .06
-
영국법상 Chinese Wall 규제 분석과 향후 자본시장법 개정에 대한 시사점 도출
금융법연구
2016 .01
-
전자상거래법 규제개선으로서의 자율규제
재산법연구
2022 .08
-
사회적 가치 실현을 위한 디지털 플랫폼 규제의 항로 모색
비교법연구
2022 .08
-
우리나라 지방규제의 주요 분야와 특성의 모색 - 등록규제를 중심으로 -
규제연구
2020 .12
-
자율규제의 유형별 사례와 플랫폼 자율규제를 위한 시사점
경제규제와 법
2022 .11
-
ICT 분야에서의 자율규제 ― 인터넷 포털과 게임 분야를 중심으로 ―
공법연구
2022 .02
-
확률형 아이템 자율규제의 적정성에 대한 연구
한국사회와 행정연구
2019 .11
-
한국·미국의 제도 비교를 통한 행정부와 입법부 간 규제개혁 협력방안 연구
의정논총
2017 .01
-
디지털 시대의 플랫폼과 소비자법
저스티스
2023 .02
-
청소년 보호를 위한 온라인 게임규제의 적정성
미디어와 인격권
2022 .12
-
온라인 플랫폼 자율규제에 관한 시론 - 맥락적 접근을 중심으로 -
경제규제와 법
2022 .11
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2017-309-002002878