메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
이정민 (고려대학교 구로병원 진단검사의학과) 윤수영 (고려대학교 구로병원 진단검사의학과) 박지영 (고려대학교 구로병원 진단검사의학과) 김지용 (고려대학교 구로병원 진단검사의학과)
저널정보
대한진단검사의학회 Laboratory Medicine Online Laboratory Medicine Online 제12권 제1호
발행연도
2022.1
수록면
33 - 39 (7page)
DOI
10.47429/lmo.2022.12.1.33

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Background: Complete blood cell count (CBC) test, peripheral blood smears (PBS), and automatic hematology analyzers are used to screen pa- tients with high-risk hematology malignancies. In this study, the workflow of urgent and routine samples and methods to improve the detection rate of blasts were evaluated. The purpose of this study was to validate the hematology rapid reporting system (HRS) for CBC and establish a strategy for the effective use of an automated hematology analyzer in clinical laboratories. Methods: The flag performances of UniCel DxH 800 (Beckman Coulter, USA) and XE-2100 (Sysmex, Japan) systems used for blood tests were analyzed for urgent and routine samples. The results were compared with PBS results. Each test method’s sensitivity and specificity were deter- mined to identify the most efficient blast detection method. In addition, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves of various parameters such as CBC and age were analyzed. Results: The sensitivity and specificity of HRS were 66.80% and 99.85%, respectively, with urgent flags (four flags) and 92.95% and 98.49%, respectively, with routine flags (15 flags). The sensitivity of HRS for routine samples was significantly different from that for urgent samples (66.80% vs. 92.95%; < 0.0001), but no significant difference was observed in the specificity for HRS between routine and urgent samples (99.85% vs. 98.49%; = 1.00). Conclusions: HRS using flags and blast history can be effectively used in clinical laboratories. HRS can be used as an effective reporting work- flow for differential CBC in clinical laboratories.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0