메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
Gilvan Vilarinho Silva-Filho (Department of Ophthalmology Irmandade da Santa Casa de Misericórdia de Sao Paulo Sao Paulo Brazil) Adriana Moreno Morgan-Kanada (Department of Ophthalmology Irmandade da Santa Casa de Misericórdia de Sao Paulo Sao Paulo Brazil) Niro Kasahara (Niro Kasahara)
저널정보
대한응급의학회 Clinical and Experimental Emergency Medicine Clinical and Experimental Emergency Medicine Vol.9 No.1
발행연도
2022.3
수록면
41 - 46 (6page)
DOI
10.15441/ceem.21.092

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Objective This study compared the prognostic value of the Pediatric Penetrating Ocular Trauma Score (POTS) with the Toddler/Infant Ocular Trauma Score (TOTS) in a cohort of Brazilian children with open-globe injuries.Methods This retrospective, observational case series included consecutive children with open-globe injuries seen at the Santa Casa de Sao Paulo Eye Emergency Service. The medical records of all patients were reviewed for data analysis, including the circumstance and time of injury, type of penetrating injury, initial and final visual acuity (VA), time of surgery, and associated eye diseases. The test characteristics of POTS and TOTS for VA were calculated and compared by the McNemar test.Results Thirty patients were included. The mean age was 3.9 ± 1.6 years; 20 were male patients and 10 were female patients. Most wounds were limited to the anterior segment (93.3%). The sensitivity for the POTS was higher than that of the TOTS (100%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 75.3?100 vs. 61.5%; 95% CI, 31.6?86.1; P = 0.014). The specificity was not significantly different (14.3%; 95% CI, 0.4?57.8 vs. 0%; 95% CI, 0?41.0; P = 0.563). The accuracy for the POTS was higher than the TOTS (70.0%; 95% CI, 45.7?88.1 vs. 40.0%; 95% CI, 19.1?63.9; P = 0.001).Conclusion In this cohort of Brazilian children with open-globe injuries, the POTS had better accuracy than did the TOTS in predicting VA after treatment.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0