메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
이석광 (경상국립대학교)
저널정보
한국영어영문학회 영어영문학 영어영문학 제67권 제4호
발행연도
2021.12
수록면
609 - 625 (17page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
This paper takes Clausewitz’s claim that war is political and suffers from its compulsive illness. War of honour, if ever, plays out in a small part and soon gets tarnished as bloodbaths when the state takes away the lives of soldiers, and a political vision creeps in as Walzer echoes Clausewitz. With the hypocrite features of war, this essay examines the work of several war poets to precipitate the view that war is political in that it departs from protection and liberation to adapt the rules of its course in order to achieve its agenda regardless of the suffering it inflicts upon the individuals that war is imposed upon. Such victims are covered over and ignored by the false glory and worthiness of death that marks the discourse surrounding the war. The cunning employed to advocate such an endeavour takes several forms, whether the religious justification of war and the forgiveness of its destruction in Sassoon’s They, the clamorous celebration of an apparent victory in Harrison’s New Year 1916 and Chesnokov’s O Glorious Leader, or simply forgetting in Owen’s Anthem for Doomed Youth. The mothers left behind by these conflicts are given either blatant lies to assuage their suffering as in Sassoon’s The Hero or must endure their grief alone as in Pearse’s The Mother, unable to find comfort in whatever glorious cause took away their children. In reading these works, this paper elucidates the kitsch morality of super-imposing noble pretexts over callous evils.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (12)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0