메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류
인문학
인문학 일반 역사학 철학 종교학 어문학 기타 인문학
사회과학
사회과학 일반 경영학 관광학 교육학 군사학 문헌정보학 법학 사회학 신문방송학 심리과학 정치외교학 지리학 행정학 경제학 무역학 인류학 기타 사회과학
자연과학
자연과학 일반 물리학 생물학 생활과학 수학·통계학 천문학 지구과학 화학 기타 자연과학
공학
공학 일반 건축공학 기계공학 산업공학 재료·에너지공학 전기전자공학 조선해양공학 화학공학 컴퓨터학 기타공학
의약학
의학 일반 간호학 수의학 약학 한의학 기초의학 임상의학 기타 의약학
농수해양학
농수해양학 일반 농학 수산학 식품과학 임학 축산학 해상운송학 기타 농수해양학
예술체육학
예술 일반 디자인 미술 미용 사진 음악학 의상 체육 공연매체예술 기타 예술체육학
복합학
학제간연구 과학기술학 뇌인지과학 기술정책 기타 복합학

ENG

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
전별 (법률사무소 동일)
저널정보
중앙대학교 법학연구원 法學論文集 法學論文集 제41권 제2호
발행연도
2017.8
수록면
27 - 54 (28page)
DOI
10.22853/caujls.2017.41.2.27

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Insurances form risk groups by gathering people who are susceptible to a common harm. They collect their funds by the payments of their clients, which have been assessed based on the law of large numbers, and guarantees coverage for the insureds’ loss by paying claims. When unanticipated accidents occur, the insured can treat their disease or compensate for their financial loss through the premium they receive from the insurer. As such, insurances enable individuals to pursue a secure life by allowing them to prepare for unexpected losses at a relatively low cost. Hence, they have become a crucial aspect of the modern life. However, individuals have begun to sign insurance contracts while lacking thorough explanations about their terms as they have become complicated, and special provisions have been included along with the diverse causes of diseases and accidents. As a result, legal disputes about refusal of insurance payment due to interpretation of clauses are continuously increasing. Especially, interpreting clauses of ‘hospitalization and surgery with the primary purpose of treatment.’ is becoming one of the most major issue in recent years. Considering the nature of insurance contracts and their clauses, it is extremely difficult for the insurer to explain every clause to the insured, nor it is essential for the insured to completely understand each clause. Nonetheless, decisions to sign a contract should be made after receiving a detailed explanation about the financial compensations the insured will receive for their loss, and fulling understanding the scope of its coverage, the major clauses, and the exclusions. However, such information is often left oblivious when signing the contract, and the information regarding ‘hospitalization and surgery with the primary purpose of treatment,’ which is the criterion in which insurance claims are inspected, is generally unmentioned nor explained to a degree in which the general public can understand. Therefore, it is common for the insured to be unable to receive any payment from their insurance, even when they have been treated for illnesses that were mentioned on their contract. Insurance companies argue that hospitalization and surgery do not have the primary purpose of treating the targeted disease, and that they are not obligated to explain the term, ‘hospitalization and surgery with the primary purpose of treatment.’ However, the duty of explanation should be judged from the perspective of the insured. Reflecting on the legal principle that any significant term, which has influence on the insureds’ interest, is liable for the duty of explanation, the scope of the ‘hospitalization and surgery with the primary purpose of treatment,’ and the fact that only claims that fall into its scope are covered should be considered as clauses that ought to be explained. Therefore, when a contract includes a clause about ‘hospitalization and surgery with the primary purpose of treatment, the insurer has the obligation to thoroughly explain it in comprehensible terms. Moreover, when such obligation is unfulfilled, the insurer cannot argue that the insured has consented to the contract. In addition, neither the insurance contract nor the related laws stipulate the scope of 'hospitalization and operation for direct treatment'. As a result, each level of courts has made different arbitrary judgement about whether or not to pay insurance payments, and individuals have suffered unexpected damage. Therefore, fundamental solution to prevent dispute about interpreting 'hospitalization and operation for direct treatment' is needed. In addition, to prevent dispute due to differences of interpretation of the terms and correcting the imbalance of information between insurer and policyholder, specify scope of "Hospitalization and Surgery with the Primary Purpose of Treatment" in the terms or insurance-related legislations may be an effective mean and be expected accomplish purpose of the insurance systems.
#설명의무 #치료를 직접적인 목적으로 하는 입원 #약관의 중요한 내용 #고객의 평균적 이해가능성 #보험계약의 내용 #Duty of explanation #Hospitalization with the primary purpose of treatment #Significant terms #The average comprehensibility of the client #The content of the Insurance Contract

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (21)

참고문헌 신청
김대희 / 2012 / 보험선진화를 위한 정보제공의무 도입방안 / 연세법학연구 4(1) google schola 김선정 / 2014 / 약관에 없는 사항에 대한 설명의무의 존부-대법원 2014. 10. 27. 선고 2012다 22242판결 / 비교법연구 14(2) google schola 김선정 / 2010 / 일본의 보험법개정과 시사점 - 총론과 공통규정을 중심으로 - / 상사법연구 28(4):9~51 google schola 김은경 / 2016 / 보험계약법 / 보험연수원 google schola 김은경 / 2009 / 독일보험계약법상 보험자의 정보제공의무 등에 대한 고찰 / 기업법연구 23(2):169~192 dbpia

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0