메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
임성훈 (서강대학교)
저널정보
충북대학교 법학연구소 법학연구 법학연구 제32권 제2호
발행연도
2021.12
수록면
63 - 90 (28page)
DOI
http://dx.doi.org/10.34267/cblj.2021.32.2.63

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
The deemed authorization or permission has been widely introduced and used, but its contents and methods are not uniform. Although regulations on the licensing agenda were introduced in General Act on Public Administration, it is difficult to see that the legal issues surrounding the deemed authorization or permission have been clearly clarified with those regulations. Looking at the flow of the Supreme Court ruling and the interpretation of the Ministry of Legislation, the divisible deemed authorization or permission is widely accepted instead of integrated deemed authorization. Even in light of the related regulations under the General Act on Public Administrative, the application of the deemed authorization or permission should be developed on the premise of the divisible deemed authorization or permission. Relevant authorization is established internally through consultation of the relevant authorizing administrative authority , and takes effect externally through notification of the primary authorization. Accordingly, the relevant authorizing administrative authority may revoke or withdraw relevant authorization, and even in the case of a dispute over relevant authorization, the relevant authorizing administrative authority may become the defendant. If consultations cannot be reached because the relevant authorization requirements are not met, a lawsuit regarding the refusal of relevant authorization is filed against relevant administrative agency. On the other hand, if it is impossible to proceed with the project according to the primary authorization without relevant authorization, the primary authorization itself may be rejected. In this case, a lawsuit is brought against the refusal of both primary and relevant authorization. The litigation becomes complicated according to the concept of divisible deemed authorization or permission but this can be resolved through the introduction of procedural rules. To this end, It is necessary to introduce regulations on the indication of the administrative agency, the presentation of reasons for the refusal of the consultation, the object of dispute and the defendant. Finally, it is necessary to reexamine whether the omission of relevant authorization procedures is justified. Under the divisible deemed authorization or permission, relevant authorization procedures are guaranteed in principle, and procedures can only be omitted in exceptional cases if necessary for rapid business progress. Legislative reorganization should be made through a comprehensive review of individual laws. In addition, the relevant authorizing administrative authority should be allowed to proceed with relevant authorization procedures if necessary.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (26)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0