메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
李蘇和 (忠北大學)
저널정보
한국중어중문학회 한국중어중문학 우수논문집 2021 한국중어중문학 우수논문집
발행연도
2022.11
수록면
183 - 208 (26page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
This is a study on the commentary and characters in Qin Bamboo Strips Collected in Yuelu Academy. This study used the results of the comparison and analysis of similar Chinese characters for its new interpretation and the studying of some Chinese characters. The phenomenon of using similar Chinese characters refers to the confused use of two similar-looking characters, and not a few misspellings by the writer are found in materials of Qin characters. In addition, errors made by the transcriber who did not have a clear understanding of similar Chinese characters are often found in the commentary of Qin Bamboo Strips Collected in Yuelu Academy. Therefore, this study found misspellings by the writer and errors by the transcriber in Qin Bamboo Strips Collected in Yuelu Academy by analyzing two pairs of similar Chinese characters the pair of 專(zhuān) and 尃(fū) and the pair of 夬(guài) and 史(shǐ) corrected the interpretation.
In Qin Bamboo Strips Collected in Yuelu Academy, 專(zhuān) and 尃(fū) look very similar but there is a clear difference. The upper part of 專(zhuān) is a combination of ‘屮’ and ‘田’, while that of 尃(fū) has a vertical stroke whose upper part is bent to the right. In Qin Bamboo Strips Collected in Yuelu Academy, there are two parts in which a character that does not correspond to these characteristics in shape. The character is 傳(zhuàn) in 肆1419正 and in 伍2025正. In this study, the character 傳(zhuàn) in the commentary has been both corrected to 傅(fù) by analyzing the characters and their shape. In addition, this study interprets the character interpreted as 鑄(zhù) as 鎛(bó) based on the characteristics of the Qin character 尃(fū).
In Qin Bamboo Strips Collected in Yuelu Academy. 夬(guài) and 史(shǐ) look quite similar but a clear difference can be found between the upper parts of the two characters through a close analysis. The upper part of 夬(guài) is similar to ‘中’ in kaishu, while that of 史(shǐ) is similar to a flat ‘ㅂ’ added with a vertical stoke in the middle. However, there are five parts in which characters cannot be interpreted by applying those characteristics in Qin Bamboo Strips Collected in Yuelu Academy. This study has reached the following conclusion by analyzing those five characters. The 夬(guài) in 壹1566 is a misspelling of 史(shǐ) made by the writer as they look similar and this study found no problem in interpreting the 夬(guài). The 夬(guài) in 壹1576 was a wrong interpretation, and this study has corrected it to 史(shǐ). The 夬(guài) in 叁438, which was a wrong interpretation, has been corrected to 史(shǐ). The 史(shǐ) in 壹567 was written by the writer in a shape similar to 夬(guài), and the 史(shǐ) in 肆1428 is a misspelling of 史(shǐ) made by the writer. This study confirmed that there were no problem in interpreting the 夬(guài).

목차

1. 引言
2. 嶽麓書院藏秦簡的介紹與研究價值
3. 嶽麓書院藏秦簡的形近字“專”與“尃”
4. 嶽麓書院藏秦簡的形近字“夬”與“史”
5. 結語
參考文獻
Abstract

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2023-820-001462897