메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
Monika Verma (National Yang-Ming Chiao Tung University)
저널정보
서울대학교 아시아연구소 아시아리뷰 아시아리뷰 제13권 제2호(통권 제28호)
발행연도
2023.8
수록면
193 - 222 (30page)
DOI
10.24987/SNUACAR.2023.8.13.2.193

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Citizenship serves as a fundamental institution for establishing membership in nation-states and serves as a framework for the interaction between individuals, social groups, and the state, delineating a set of rights and responsibilities. While citizenship has been traditionally viewed as a means to promote Government accountability and ensure the welfare of citizens within the nation-state’s boundaries, it has also been used as a tool for excluding non-citizens and marginalized groups in modern times. The Citizenship (Amendment) Act of 2019 serves as a notable illustration of this phenomenon. This Act confers Indian citizenship upon specific religious groups, including Hindus, Sikhs, Buddhists, Jains, Parsis, and Christians, based on religious persecution in Pakistan, Afghanistan, and Bangladesh while disregarding others such as Rohingyas, Ahmadiyyas, and Uyghurs. Numerous studies have explored the complex factors that led to the creation of the Citizenship (Amendment) Act (CAA), with many attributing it to the pro-Hindu and anti-Muslim stance of the ruling Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP). However, few studies have examined the historical context that led to its development. This paper aims to address this gap in the literature by highlighting the long-standing history of inclusion and exclusion in citizenship amendment acts, dating back to the origins of the Citizenship Act, 1955. Adopting a postcolonial lens to the concept of citizenship, this paper contends that the selective inclusion and exclusion of certain groups in the Citizenship (Amendment) Act of 2019 is not only rooted in BJP’s politics of inclusion and exclusion but also in India’s postcolonial history and citizenship practices. Furthermore, the paper hypothesizes that India’s citizenship policy regarding migrants/refugees has gradually become less inclusive and, in some cases, exclusionary on religious grounds.

목차

I. Introduction
II. Research Methodology
III. Citizenship in Postcolonial Societies: A Critical Perspective
IV. A Gradual Anomaly in Citizenship: The Indian Postcolonial State and the Differential Legal Domain for Non-Citizens/Refugees
V. Revisiting the Citizenship Act of 1955: Exploring Various Amendments to this Legislation
VI. Citizenship (Amendment) Act, 2019 and its Discontents: A well-thought-out strategy
VII. Conclusion
Reference

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0