메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
MURPHY ODO DENNIS (부산대학교)
저널정보
부산대학교 과학교육연구소 교사교육연구 교사교육연구 제62권 제1호
발행연도
2023.3
수록면
55 - 68 (14page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Formulaic language has traditionally not been given sufficient consideration by ELT materials developers. Thus, the lexical bundles (LBs) used in reading texts found in high stakes language tests may not reflect the kinds of phrasings used in the target domain of the test calling its validity into question. To investigate this issue in the English section of the Korean college scholastic ability test (CSAT), all of the reading texts from the 2017 through 2021 CSAT examinations were used to build a CSAT corpus which was compared with the Manually Annotated Sub-Corpus (MASC) reference corpus and Martinez & Schmitt’s (2012) PHRASE list. LBs were extracted for the analysis using Wordsmith 8. The analysis involved examining the frequency and distribution of lexical bundles and other linguistic features in the two corpora. It was found that only two LBs were shared between the top ten most frequent phrases in the CSAT and MASC, indicating that most of the high-frequency LBs in the CSAT were not the same as those in the MASC. The structures and functions of LBs were also compared, and while there were some minor differences between the two corpora, they were generally similar. Additionally, the CSAT contained fewer useful LBs than the MASC, but the difference was not large. Based on these findings, it is suggested that CSAT creators give more consideration to the formulaic language used in the adapted texts used in the CSAT.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0