지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This paper criticizes Lee & Hwang (2021) and Yang (2022) that dealt with the appearance of the Korean postvocalic nominative marker -ka [ɡa] in the 17th century. Lee & Hwang (2021) have argued that it is highly probable that -ka was borrowed from Japanese. Their argument presupposes that the Japanese nominative marker -ga was phonetically [ɡa] in the 16-17th centuries. However, the presupposition is false and the borrowing hypothesis cannot be true. The Japanese nominative marker was phonetically [ŋɡa] at the time and the prenasalized stop [ŋɡ] was perceived as a nasal-stop cluster [ŋɡ] by Koreans of the time. Thus, if the Japanese nominative marker was borrowed into Korean in the 16-17th centuries, it should have become -ŋka [ŋɡa] in Korean, as Japanese tabako [tambako] ‘tobacco’ was borrowed into Korean as tampako [tambaɡo] in the early 17th century. Furthermore, we still arrive at the conclusion that Lee & Hwang’s (2021) argument is implausible, even when we review it under the assumption that the Japanese nominative marker had been phonetically [ɡa] in the 16-17th centuries.
I have argued elsewhere (Ko 2014) that the nominative marker -ka developed from the interrogative marker -ka attached to the end of minor sentences. Yang (2022) has also argued that the nominative marker -ka developed from the interrogative marker -ka , but the interrogative marker -ka in his argument is that used in full sentences. He doubts whether the interrogative marker -ka can lose its identity in minor sentences because there is no other constituent that can take over the function of indicating question. However, his doubt is groundless because questions may be indicated by intonation alone. Yang (2022) assumes that an inverted interrogative cleft construction underwent reanalysis and as a result the interrogative marker -ka thereof was reinterpreted as a nominative marker. However, the reanalysis was possible only if a constituent of the construction was misperceived as another homophonous form, and the misperception could not occur since the resulting sentence could make no sense at all.
I have argued elsewhere (Ko 2014) that the nominative marker -ka developed from the interrogative marker -ka attached to the end of minor sentences. Yang (2022) has also argued that the nominative marker -ka developed from the interrogative marker -ka , but the interrogative marker -ka in his argument is that used in full sentences. He doubts whether the interrogative marker -ka can lose its identity in minor sentences because there is no other constituent that can take over the function of indicating question. However, his doubt is groundless because questions may be indicated by intonation alone. Yang (2022) assumes that an inverted interrogative cleft construction underwent reanalysis and as a result the interrogative marker -ka thereof was reinterpreted as a nominative marker. However, the reanalysis was possible only if a constituent of the construction was misperceived as another homophonous form, and the misperception could not occur since the resulting sentence could make no sense at all.
목차
1. 머리말
2. 이용규 · 황선엽(2021)의 일본어 차용설에 대한 비판
3. 양재영(2022)에 대한 비판
4. 맺음말
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
주격 조사 ‘가’ 중출 구문 연구-구어 문어 말뭉치 분석을 바탕으로-
언어과학
2016 .01
-
한국어 주격표지, 격표지의 생략, 초점, 그리고 화제
언어학
2021 .12
-
A Corpus-based analysis of the usage of Korean markers ?(n)un and -i/ka in editorial texts
언어와 정보
2015 .12
-
VP-Internal Nominative in Multiple Nominative Constructions
현대문법연구
2021 .09
-
한국어 주격 표지 ‘-이/가’와 화제의 표시
언어연구
2019 .01
-
On the Identity and Distribution of “Case Markers” in Korean
언어
2023 .06
-
중세․근대국어 주격조사 연구의 쟁점과 과제
국어사연구
2016 .01
-
구결자 ‘’와 ‘’의 형태 분석에 대하여 ‒ 분포와 기능이 겹치는 ‘’와 ‘’를 중심으로
동양학
2020 .01
-
일본어 모어화자의 한국어 주격조사 습득
언어사실과 관점
2019 .01
-
國語 主格의 形成과 相
국어국문학
2024 .06
-
주절과 전제된 종속절에서의 한국어 조사 -이/가
언어학 연구
2015 .10
-
미얀마어 주격 표지 ‘-ha’의 특수성
언어학
2020 .12
-
How can Korean -i/ka express exhaustivity?
언어와 정보
2015 .12
-
중세 한국어 ‘이ㅿㅏ’의 문법적 성격과 실현 양상 -법화경언해를 중심으로-
우리말연구
2021 .10
-
Two Types of Multiple Nominatives in Korean
언어학
2020 .04
-
L2 Acquisition of Korean Nominative and Accusative Case Particles
언어학 연구
2021 .10
-
The Korean i/ka Marker and Contextual Specification by the Qualia Structure
영어영문학
2015 .11
-
일본인 한국어 학습자의 조사 ‘을/를’, ‘이/가’ 교체 연구 - ‘-고 싶다’ 구문을 대상으로 -
언어과학
2020 .01
-
Nominative Case Assignment by v[Tense]
현대문법연구
2021 .09
-
‘-고 싶다’ 구문의 본용언에 직접 선행하는 ‘이/가’ 조사구의 주어성 검증
어문학
2016 .12
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-151-24-02-089263636