메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
Fang Li (한국외국어대학교)
저널정보
한국영어영문학회 영어영문학 영어영문학 제70권 제1호
발행연도
2024.3
수록면
147 - 166 (20page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
The epigraph of E.M. Forster’s Howards End, “Only Connect,” is a transitive verb without a direct object or even a subject: the verb connect is a connector, but there is no person to connect and nothing to connect to. Here I source the mysterious Connector and its Connect-ee by using three theories, all connected to historical materialism in one way or another. First, I use the concepts of C-M-C’ and M-C-M’ in Marx’s historical materialist study Capital to distinguish between characters concerned with the eponymous Howards End as home (typically uncountable) and those who treat it as “a house”, that is, a unit of real estate. Marx’s concepts, however, explain commodity circulation, not gift-giving. So I then link Marx’s historical materialist study to Mauss’s exploration of gift-giving in so-called “primitive societies”, which can be used to situate Forster’s argument in pre-capitalist times going back at least as far as Beowulf. But Marx and Mauss are neither literary nor linguistic theorists. So, finally, I apply Hasan’s understanding of three levels of patterning in verbal art: verbalization (text), symbolic articulation (patterns of text that realize characters, events, situations), and finally theme (some theory of human social being). In this way, I try to explain Forster’s textual choices by his symbolic articulation into a contrast of two value forms and his symbolic articulation by the theme of connecting real estate and home.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0