지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2024.2
- 수록면
- 1 - 19 (19page)
- DOI
- 10.3346/jkms.2024.39.e53
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Background: Worldwide, sepsis is the leading cause of death in hospitals. If mortality rates in patients with sepsis can be predicted early, medical resources can be allocated efficiently. We constructed machine learning (ML) models to predict the mortality of patients with sepsis in a hospital emergency department.
Methods: This study prospectively collected nationwide data from an ongoing multicenter cohort of patients with sepsis identified in the emergency department. Patients were enrolled from 19 hospitals between September 2019 and December 2020. For acquired data from 3,657 survivors and 1,455 deaths, six ML models (logistic regression, support vector machine, random forest, extreme gradient boosting [XGBoost], light gradient boosting machine, and categorical boosting [CatBoost]) were constructed using fivefold cross-validation to predict mortality. Through these models, 44 clinical variables measured on the day of admission were compared with six sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) components (PaO2/FIO2 [PF], platelets (PLT), bilirubin, cardiovascular, Glasgow Coma Scale score, and creatinine).
The confidence interval (CI) was obtained by performing 10,000 repeated measurements via random sampling of the test dataset. All results were explained and interpreted using Shapley’s additive explanations (SHAP).
Results: Of the 5,112 participants, CatBoost exhibited the highest area under the curve (AUC) of 0.800 (95% CI, 0.756–0.840) using clinical variables. Using the SOFA components for the same patient, XGBoost exhibited the highest AUC of 0.678 (95% CI, 0.626–0.730). As interpreted by SHAP, albumin, lactate, blood urea nitrogen, and international normalization ratio were determined to significantly affect the results. Additionally, PF and PLTs in the SOFA component significantly influenced the prediction results.
Conclusion: Newly established ML-based models achieved good prediction of mortality in patients with sepsis. Using several clinical variables acquired at the baseline can provide more accurate results for early predictions than using SOFA components. Additionally, the impact of each variable was identified.
목차
등록된 정보가 없습니다.
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
Explainable machine learning using perioperative serial laboratory results to predict postoperative mortality in patients with peritonitis-induced sepsis
Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research
2023 .10
-
Mortality difference between early-identified sepsis and late-identified sepsis
Clinical and Experimental Emergency Medicine
2020 .01
-
Application of Sepsis-3 Criteria to Korean Patients with Critical Illnesses
Acute and Critical Care
2019 .01
-
Biomarkers for Prediction of Mortality and Sepsis
대한외과학회 학술대회 초록집
2021 .11
-
Reappraisal of sepsis-3 and CLIF-SOFA as predictors of mortality in patients with cirrhosis and infection presenting to the emergency department: A multicenter study
Clinical and Molecular Hepatology
2022 .07
-
Sepsis: Early Recognition and Optimized Treatment
Tuberculosis and Respiratory Diseases
2019 .01
-
Pre-Sepsis Length of Hospital Stay and Mortality: A Nationwide Multicenter Cohort Study
Journal of Korean Medical Science
2024 .03
-
Cancer Patients Are at High Risk of Mortality if Presenting with Sepsis at an Emergency Department
Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP
2016 .01
-
Quick Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment score is not sensitive enough to predict 28-day mortality in emergency department patients with sepsis: a retrospective review
Clinical and Experimental Emergency Medicine
2019 .01
-
A comparison of scoring systems for predicting mortality and sepsis in the emergency department patients with a suspected infection
Clinical and Experimental Emergency Medicine
2021 .12
-
Korean Registry for Improving Sepsis Survival (KISS): Protocol for a Multicenter Cohort of Adult Patients with Sepsis or Septic Shock
Infection and Chemotherapy
2020 .01
-
ChatGPT Predicts In-Hospital All-Cause Mortality for Sepsis: In-Context Learning with the Korean Sepsis Alliance Database
Healthcare Informatics Research
2024 .07
-
Hypoalbuminemia, Low Base Excess Values, and Tachypnea Predict 28-Day Mortality in Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock Patients in the Emergency Department
Yonsei Medical Journal
2016 .01
-
Sepsis-induced cardiomyopathy is associated with higher mortality rates in patients with sepsis
Acute and Critical Care
2021 .08
-
Improved MSS method in a CLP-induced mouse sepsis model
한국실험동물학회 학술발표대회 논문집
2021 .07
-
Characteristics, management and clinical outcomes of patients with sepsis: a multicenter cohort study in Korea
Acute and Critical Care
2019 .01
-
노쇠의 지표로서 보행능력이 패혈증 환자의 예후에 미치는 영향
대한응급의학회지
2021 .01
-
패혈증의 새 정의에 대한 논쟁
대한내과학회지
2017 .01
-
Usefulness of presepsin in predicting the prognosis of patients with sepsis or septic shock: a retrospective cohort study
Journal of Yeungnam Medical Science
2021 .10
-
Epidemiology of sepsis in Korea: a population-based study of incidence, mortality, cost and risk factors for death in sepsis
Clinical and Experimental Emergency Medicine
2019 .01
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0