메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
오윤식
저널정보
한양법학회 한양법학 한양법학 제35권 제4집(통권 제88집)
발행연도
2024.11
수록면
59 - 101 (43page)
DOI
10.35227/HYLR.2024.11.35.4.59

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
This article considers the content of the amendments to the Federal Elections Act (Bundeswahlgesetz) that were implemented in 2023. It then draws implications for the direction of the proposed amendments to the Public Official Election Act. The following is a summary of the contents of this article.
First, German personalised PR system, which has become a model for legislation around the world due to its high degree of proportionality, created 34 overhang mandates and awarded 103 balance seats in the 2021 Bundestag elections, resulting in an increase of 137 seats. This massive increase in seats was a direct trigger for the reform of Federal Elections Act in 2023.
Second, a key part of this reform, which was passed by the Bundestag on the initiative of the Social Democratic Party, was the abolition of overhang mandates. In the case of overhang mandates the apportionment process should be determined by the second vote basis procedure (Zweitstimmendeckungsverfahren). In other words, if the number of successful candidates who won a majority of first votes in their respective constituencies exceeds the number of seats that a party’s Land list receives based on their second vote, then those candidates with the lowest percentages of first votes are not assigned a seat (§ 6(1) and (4) first and second sentence Federal Elections Act).
Third, on 30 July 2024, in abstract judicial review proceedings brought by the State of Bayern and 195 members of the Bundestag from the Christian Social Union and Christian Democratic Union, the Second Senate of the Federal Constitutional Court held that provisions relating to the second vote basis procedure were compatible with Art. 38(1) first sentence, Art. 38(3) and Art. 21(1) of the Basic Law (Grundgesetz), but that the provisions concerning the 5% electoral threshold were unconstitutional as violating Art. 21(1) and Art. 38(1) first sentence of the Basic Law and ordered their continued application until amended.
Fifth, in my view, the constitutional obligation of the legislature to design the electoral process in such a way that every voter can predict how his or her vote will affect success or failure of a candidate is also part of the principle of direct elections. Therefore, the provisions violates the principle of direct elections. It is also reasonable to conclude that the provisions relating to the second vote basis procedure violate the principle of democracy underlying the majority rule, as they violate the very essence of the first-past-the-post system, which is based on the universal recognition that the candidate who receives the most votes in a direct election is the winner.

목차

Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 독일의 최근 선거법 개정의 내용
Ⅲ. 의석 수 범위 내 확인 절차에 관한 위헌 논쟁
Ⅳ. 결론
참고문헌
Abstract

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-151-25-02-092133660