메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
부산경남사학회 역사와경계 역사와경계 제53집
발행연도
2004.12
수록면
133 - 166 (34page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
To consider in detail the nature of casual labour as the essence of dock labour, it is important to investigate how dockers exist in terms of job and employment types. This may not only help determine characteristics of dock labour itself, but also play an important role in forming dock union-management relations. The labour processes of the London Dock were already numerously divided. Discrimination between skilled and unskilled labourers in
relation to dock labour was made in accordance with several factors such as skills and knowledge and social, economic and moral perceptions. Above all, knowledge and skills had to be obtained to become skilled labourers. In the London Dock, there were no formal,
clear procedures through which people could be skilled labourers. Persons who wanted to make themselves skilled labourers of the dock, had to use an irrational, exclusive employment system involving heredity, entreaty or tribes. After the general strike of the London Dock in 1889, the New Unionism was formed. They abandoned what was initially regraded as a nature of general union. This may be explained by the fact that the labour force of the London Dock in the late 19th century accepted and reflected social changes of the period. In the late 19th century, Britain had an economic situation that could not ensure the stability of employment. Such situation played a critical role in making the New Unionism, which initially sought to be a general union, change into a closed organization. Such change was not merely an reaction against changes in external environments including national economic crisis. It was probably a consequence of fundamental and structural contradictions that had been existed in the dock. The clear discrimination among dockers prevented the New Unionism from maintaining itself as a general union under which all of the dockers were united. The initially formed union could not avoid giving up a position as a general union as they could not overcome its limitations under the combination of its internal, structural contradictions and the national economic crisis of the late 19th century.

목차

Ⅰ. 머리말

Ⅱ. 부두노동자의 형성과 규모

Ⅲ. 부두노동자의 존재형태와 구성

Ⅳ. 맺음말

【Abstract】

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-911-014462863