지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Problem of integration was one of the important tasks in the history of Korea. And the integration movements in the Korean history were evolved with Dangun-nationalism. Dangun-nationalism means the consciousness or movements which persued the ethnical integration under the identity of Dangun's decendants. It thought that Korean nation had one origin which began with Dangun's founding Joseon in B.C.2333. Dangun-nationalism had worked as a power sourse for national identity, independency, integration, democracy, justice and welfare. This paper examines the context especially between Dangun-nationalism and integration movements in the Korean history.
Through the entire history of Korea, integration movement had developed by three phases, and at every stages Dangun-nationalism had intervened and contributed. In the pre-medieval era, Korean people were devided by Samhan(三韓. Samguk三國) consciousness which was derived from the ancient three states named Goguryo, Baikje, and Sinra (or Mahan, Byenhan, Jinhan) Overcoming this Samhan consciousness was the first task in making one integrated state. In this first stage of integration movement, Dangun-nationalism played an important role. During the medieval age most history books described the fact of Dangun's founding state at the beginning of the Korean history.
Second phase was the grate family (大家族) state movement in the Hanmal(韓末) period. In that age it was the prime task to overcome the medieval discrimination such as status, region, birth, etc.. At the Hanmal period dangun-nationalism became generalized. The consciousness of Dangun's decendants spreaded broadly, Gaecheonjeol(the memorial day of Dangun's founding state) began to be commemorated, and the Hongikingan ideology (the Dangun's aim in founding state and opening human society) attracted public attentions. We can say that Korean people were changed into 'modern nation' from 'pre-modern nation' at the Hanmal and Japanese rule period. And the evolution into 'modern nation'was accomplished through the medium of Dangun-nationalism.
Third phase was the left-right wing cooperation movement and the unified state founding movement in post-Samil-undong(1919) era and post liberation(1945) era. It was the main task to integrate the left-right ideological split and class struggle. Dangun-nationalism played an important role in approaching third phase's task. Dangun-nationalism provided the reason why Koreans must be unified, and the cooperation and integration movements often emphasized the national homogeniety of Dangun's decendants. And the theories for integration (i.e. Jo-soang's Samgyunism, An-jaehong's Neo-nationalism) were made under the influence of Dangun-nationalism. The Hongikingan ideology was re-interpreted as the integration principle emphasizing equality, welfare and the morality of self-sacrifice. Dangun-nationalism was weakened through the cold-war age, but its role on the tasks for national integration and world-wide Korean community is still exist.
Through the entire history of Korea, integration movement had developed by three phases, and at every stages Dangun-nationalism had intervened and contributed. In the pre-medieval era, Korean people were devided by Samhan(三韓. Samguk三國) consciousness which was derived from the ancient three states named Goguryo, Baikje, and Sinra (or Mahan, Byenhan, Jinhan) Overcoming this Samhan consciousness was the first task in making one integrated state. In this first stage of integration movement, Dangun-nationalism played an important role. During the medieval age most history books described the fact of Dangun's founding state at the beginning of the Korean history.
Second phase was the grate family (大家族) state movement in the Hanmal(韓末) period. In that age it was the prime task to overcome the medieval discrimination such as status, region, birth, etc.. At the Hanmal period dangun-nationalism became generalized. The consciousness of Dangun's decendants spreaded broadly, Gaecheonjeol(the memorial day of Dangun's founding state) began to be commemorated, and the Hongikingan ideology (the Dangun's aim in founding state and opening human society) attracted public attentions. We can say that Korean people were changed into 'modern nation' from 'pre-modern nation' at the Hanmal and Japanese rule period. And the evolution into 'modern nation'was accomplished through the medium of Dangun-nationalism.
Third phase was the left-right wing cooperation movement and the unified state founding movement in post-Samil-undong(1919) era and post liberation(1945) era. It was the main task to integrate the left-right ideological split and class struggle. Dangun-nationalism played an important role in approaching third phase's task. Dangun-nationalism provided the reason why Koreans must be unified, and the cooperation and integration movements often emphasized the national homogeniety of Dangun's decendants. And the theories for integration (i.e. Jo-soang's Samgyunism, An-jaehong's Neo-nationalism) were made under the influence of Dangun-nationalism. The Hongikingan ideology was re-interpreted as the integration principle emphasizing equality, welfare and the morality of self-sacrifice. Dangun-nationalism was weakened through the cold-war age, but its role on the tasks for national integration and world-wide Korean community is still exist.
목차
Ⅰ. 머리말
Ⅱ. 한국사 속에서의 단군민족주의
Ⅲ. 삼일운동까지의 통일운동과 단군민족주의
Ⅳ. 통일민족국가 수립운동과 단군민족주의
Ⅴ. 맺음말
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
남과 북의 단군인식과 단군숭앙
고조선단군학
2005 .06
-
최근의 단군관련 인식혼란과 과제
고조선단군학
2002 .12
-
단군 : 역사와 신화, 그리고 민족
역사비평
2016 .11
-
단군학과 한국정치학 : 근대 정치사상을 중심으로
고조선단군학
2005 .12
-
'단군민족주의'의 前史
고조선단군학
2003 .06
-
일제시기 단군을 둘러싼 한일간의 공방
韓國史學史學報
2010 .01
-
대종교와 '단군민족주의'
고조선단군학
2004 .06
-
북한의 단군민족주의에 대한 검토
고조선단군학
2019 .06
-
단순신화의 단군 왕검의 고의 (古義) 연구
한국기독교신학논총
2000 .06
-
전근대 동국의식의 역사적 성격 재검토
역사비평
2015 .05
-
조소앙의 단군민족주의와 삼균사상
고조선단군학
2018 .06
-
단기 연호, 개천절 국경일, 홍익인간 교육이념 : 현대 한국에서의 단군민족주의의 제도화에 관한 연구
한국학(구 정신문화연구)
2008 .12
-
북한의 단군신화 인식에 대한 연구 : 문화적 관점을 중심으로
고조선단군학
2005 .12
-
‘단군’을 소재(素材)로 한 소설 고찰 : 새로운 스토리텔링(storytelling) 모색을 중심으로
고조선단군학
2006 .12
-
교과서에서의 ‘단군 사화(史話)’ 수용 고찰
고조선단군학
2008 .11
-
현대 한국의 단군 인식과 민족문제
동북아역사논총
2008 .06
-
교과서에 서술된 ‘단군과 고조선’에 관한 고찰 : 문학교과서(7차 교육과정)를 중심으로
고조선단군학
2007 .06
-
근대 한국의 단군 인식과 민족주의
동북아역사논총
2008 .06
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-911-015114535