메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
대한생물치료정신의학회 생물치료정신의학 생물치료정신의학 제4권 제1호
발행연도
1998.6
수록면
71 - 83 (13page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
In recent studies on panic disorder, it is coming to be known that patient's cognitive appraisal on the panic attack is the best predictor of agoraphobic avoidance. This study is a preliminary research to develop a Korean version of Panic Appraisal Inventory(PAI) which examines the cognitive appraisal on the panic attack. The Panic Appraisal Inventory developed by Telch et al has been translated into Korean in consideration of the differences in culture and language, followed by testing its reliability.
The subjects were twenty in number, who were diagnosed, based on DSM-Ⅳ criteria, as panic disorder by a psychiatrist and a psychiatric resident.
The following are the results of this study:
The correlation coefficient of the scale 1 in the test-retest reliability was a significant of 0.58 ; in Crohnbach's alpha, showed a high internal consistency with 0.86 ; the correlation coefficient of the scale 2 was a relatively high of 0.81 ; among the three subscales of the scale 2, the correlation coefficient of the P subscale was 0.63, that of the L subscale, 0.83, and that of the L subscale, 0.78, and all of them were significant ; Crohnbach's alpha of the scale 2 showed a high internal consistency with 0.92 ; the correlation coefficient of the scale 3 was a relatively high of 0.83 ; in Crohnbach's alpha, showed a high consistency with 0.88. As results of factor analysis for the three subscales of the scale 2 by the Varimax rotation method, the extracted factors were not correlated with the items of three subscales.
In conclusion, this is a preliminary study designed to standardize a Korean version of Panic Appraisal Inventory, and the tests of the reliability and the internal consistency of each item showed significant results. Follow-up studies should be carried out for validation applying various scales on a larger number of patients.

목차

영어 초록
서론
연구대상 및 방법
결과
고찰
참고문헌
부록

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-513-017205668