지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This thesis is about the importance of the writing history of Korean literature that might restore and systemize heterogeneous national histories caused by having been divided into South and North Korea for sixty years. It is also about the concrete methods of writing history of Korean literature. I have been searching for concrete approaches of the history of literature, comparing modern literatures that have been published in both South and North Korea until now. For we need to seek the history of national literature with resuscitative and open-minded attitudes.
The main discourse, which is the keynote and the outline of this thesis, gives three preconditions for writing a new history of literature. One of them is a serious attitude that destroy the wall of the long division of Korea into North and South Korea. And this attitude tries to seek true national unification literature. In this globalization era, we need to expand territories. Therefore, we should consider Koreans in China, old USSR, U.S.A., Japan, Australia as well as Koreans in South and North Korea. We could also expand literatures written in other languages. And we need to often hold seminars in domestic and overseas. We could make a informationalization of the literatures of South and North Korea and exchange information.
Next chapter gropes and shows the description methods of the history of literature that are itemized discussions. First, it presents the writer's objectivity and autonomy. And it also presents the need to balance the authors and the eras focused by the main genres. Above all, it suggests Proletarian literature, Anti-Japanese literature and national literature in 1930's be assessed and accepted together. It suggests that we should emphasize 'Donghok gasa' more than social activities achieved by certain people in sorting the origin point of new literature and the time of modern literature. It gives new opinion that we need to change contemporary literature which is long and has vague boundaries into current literature which existed after post-war literature in 1950's. Lastly, it sees the antagonistic relationship between proletarian literature and national literature as a dialectic development.
The main discourse, which is the keynote and the outline of this thesis, gives three preconditions for writing a new history of literature. One of them is a serious attitude that destroy the wall of the long division of Korea into North and South Korea. And this attitude tries to seek true national unification literature. In this globalization era, we need to expand territories. Therefore, we should consider Koreans in China, old USSR, U.S.A., Japan, Australia as well as Koreans in South and North Korea. We could also expand literatures written in other languages. And we need to often hold seminars in domestic and overseas. We could make a informationalization of the literatures of South and North Korea and exchange information.
Next chapter gropes and shows the description methods of the history of literature that are itemized discussions. First, it presents the writer's objectivity and autonomy. And it also presents the need to balance the authors and the eras focused by the main genres. Above all, it suggests Proletarian literature, Anti-Japanese literature and national literature in 1930's be assessed and accepted together. It suggests that we should emphasize 'Donghok gasa' more than social activities achieved by certain people in sorting the origin point of new literature and the time of modern literature. It gives new opinion that we need to change contemporary literature which is long and has vague boundaries into current literature which existed after post-war literature in 1950's. Lastly, it sees the antagonistic relationship between proletarian literature and national literature as a dialectic development.
목차
Ⅰ. 서론(문제제기)
Ⅱ. 통일문학사 쓰기의 전제조건
Ⅲ. 문학사 기술의 구체적 방향
Ⅳ. 맺음말
참고 문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
북한문학사의 고전문학 서술 양상
한국문학논총
2004 .01
-
중국고전 문학사 다시 쓰기(rewriting) 작업을 위한 몇 가지 전제
중국학논총
2007 .01
-
세계화 시대의 한국문학 : 세계문학과 지역문학의 좌표
국어국문학
2010 .08
-
National Literature of Korea
Korea Journal
1974 .08
-
우리 문학의 연구 현황과 전망
우리말글
2004 .08
-
The Influence of Chinese Literature on Korean Literature
Korea Journal
1972 .01
-
現代詩史 記述方法 考察
한국시학연구
2005 .12
-
해외 한인문학의 존재와 당위 : ‘한민족문학’ 범주의 설정을 제안하며
국어국문학
2009 .09
-
Korean Literature and Adjacent Literatures
Korea Journal
1982 .10
-
문학교육에서의 인지의 문제 - 문학의 순환적 위계화의 필요성과 가능성
문학교육학
2003 .01
-
Modern Korea Literature
Korea Journal
1967 .12
-
Modern Korea and Literature
Korea Journal
1962 .08
-
지역문학사 서술의 가능성과 방향
국어국문학
2006 .12
-
문학적 ‘통이(通異)’와 문학사적 통합 : 북한문학 연구의 존재 증명
한국근대문학연구
2009 .04
-
역사의 종말, 그 이후의 문학 : 중국 현대소설과 한국 젊은 작가들을 중심으로
어문론집
2008 .09
-
Comparison of Digital Literature between South Korea and North America1
영어영문학연구
2017 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-710-017326085