메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
대한국토·도시계획학회 국토계획 國土計劃 第35卷 第3號
발행연도
2000.6
수록면
35 - 50 (16page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Since the modern planning system was first introduced to Korea by the Japanese during the colonial period. Japanese influences have been deeply rooted within most of the legal structure of the planning system in Korea. After the Independence. American planning philosophy has been added to Korean land use planning system, thus landowner has boundless freedom to utilize his land as far as it does not violate the zoning regulation, which is quite different from the land use control system of most European countries where the land use is strictly controlled through public land use plan(s). However, hasty and indigested adoption of foreign planning mechanism has created diverse conflicts between the ideal and the reality.
The basic structure of Korean land use planning system has two tiers, while one is superior to the other in terms of legal hierarchy. The former is the 'National Land Use Plan' based on 'Land Use Management Law', and the later is 'Zoning Plan' by 'Urban Planning Law'. This two tier system similar to Japanese system leaves a lot of loophole, and has been blamed for irregular development in the gray zone between two tiers.
The purpose of this paper is to analyse problems of the present Korean land use control mechanism and propose new improved alternatives. To do this, foreign land use control systems were examined. As a result, this paper proposed 3 alternatives. The first alternative is adoption of a sequential planning system under a single planning law, preferably 'Land Use Management Law' similar to English and German systems. In this system, the concept of development permission is required. The second alternative is to maintain two planning laws as is now but with clear distinction and hierarchy. The third alternative is to let the expanded urban planning law control all the land use both in the urban area and the countryside. The first alternative was chosen as the best in this paper, though it might require a lot of changes in present land use planning system and be difficult to implement all at once.

목차

ABSTRACT
Ⅰ. 序論
Ⅱ. 土地利用計劃體系의 現況과 問題
Ⅲ. 外國의 土地利用計劃制度
Ⅳ. 土地利用計劃體系의 改善方向
結論

參考文獻

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-539-017532919