지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
International criminal law (at least at the present phase of its development) does not comprise any offence entailing strict liability. That is to say, all recognized international offences - whether they exist under customary or conventional international law - have two cumulative constituent elements: a criminal act (Actus reus) and a criminal consciousness (mens rea). In some treaties, the indispensability of mens rea as an essential component of any international offence is stated in explicit terms.
It follows from the present commentary that the accused in international penal proceedings can benefit from a limited number of legitimate defences based on lack of niens rea (duress, mistake and insanity). The availability of each of these defences depends on the occurrence of special circumstances, and often the precise scope of application (pre-eminently in the sphere of duress) is quite controversial. Core defences can be encrusted with pleas that do not provide the accused with any independent shield, yet - when appropriate - may call criminal responsibility into question in light of a core defence. This is the position where obedience to superior orders is concerned : the real issue is duress or mistake (namely, lack of mens rea).
Attempts to broaden the gamut of legitimate defences have not been crowned with success, In particular, claims of obedience to national law and attribution of criminal acts to the state have been clearly stigmatized as fictitious defences.
In many instances, when an accused fails to elude criminal conviction altogether, he may still benefit from mitigation of punishment. Nevertheless, such mitigation cannot be taken for granted: it is a matter of discretion depending on the nature of the offence as well as the actual conduct of the accused.
It follows from the present commentary that the accused in international penal proceedings can benefit from a limited number of legitimate defences based on lack of niens rea (duress, mistake and insanity). The availability of each of these defences depends on the occurrence of special circumstances, and often the precise scope of application (pre-eminently in the sphere of duress) is quite controversial. Core defences can be encrusted with pleas that do not provide the accused with any independent shield, yet - when appropriate - may call criminal responsibility into question in light of a core defence. This is the position where obedience to superior orders is concerned : the real issue is duress or mistake (namely, lack of mens rea).
Attempts to broaden the gamut of legitimate defences have not been crowned with success, In particular, claims of obedience to national law and attribution of criminal acts to the state have been clearly stigmatized as fictitious defences.
In many instances, when an accused fails to elude criminal conviction altogether, he may still benefit from mitigation of punishment. Nevertheless, such mitigation cannot be taken for granted: it is a matter of discretion depending on the nature of the offence as well as the actual conduct of the accused.
목차
Ⅰ. 序論
Ⅱ. 범죄의지의 부족에 의거하는 항변
Ⅲ. 공적 자격에 의거하는 항변
Ⅳ. 結論
參考文獻
ABSTRACT
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
actus reus와 mens rea
법학연구
2003 .12
-
일본 회사법에 있어서의 주식제도와 코포레이트 거버넌스 － 신주예약권제도의 활용을 중심으로 －
경영법률
2009 .01
-
심신장애 판정의 문제점과 개선방안 : 각국의 제도 및 현황을 비교하여
형사정책연구원 연구총서
2004 .12
-
형법에 있어서 고의개념의 체계적 지위
성신법학
2001 .02
-
중.일 犯罪故意論의 비교법적 고찰
형사법연구
2009 .01
-
형사정책연구 30년의 성과와 과제(II) : 형사법 연구
형사정책연구원 연구총서
2019 .03
-
RIGHTS OF THE ACCUSED IN AMERICAN CRIMINAL LAW
한국법학원보
1974 .03
-
캐나다 형법에 대한 연구
비교형사법연구
2004 .01
-
犯罪의 國際化와 刑法의 役割
형사정책연구
2002 .09
-
中國 刑法上 犯罪過程에서의 犯罪形態
법학연구
2005 .06
-
결과발생시의 행위와 결과사이의 미수범 평가(評價) : 日本에서의 논의를 중심으로
동북아 문화연구
2012 .03
-
형사특별법 정비방안(4) 특정경제범죄가중처벌법등에관한법률
형사정책연구원 연구총서
2008 .12
-
朝鮮朝大明律直解의 刑法總則的條項의 分析
형사정책연구
2003 .09
-
영미형법에 있어 주관적 범죄요건(Mens Rea)에 대한 연구
비교형사법연구
2007 .01
-
사이버범죄 방지를 위한 국제공조방안
형사정책연구원 연구총서
2004 .12
-
방위산업체의 경영성과 영향요인에 대한 실증연구
국방정책연구
2008 .01
-
損害의 轉嫁와 獨占規制法 第56條 1項 ‘損害’의 槪念 및 範圍 : Passing on Defence 問題를 中心으로
비교사법
2007 .12
-
기업의 형사책임에 대한 논의- 독점규제 및 공정거래에 관한 법률을 중심으로 -
법학논집
2013 .01
-
중국 부동산 관련법의 의미와 내용
원광법학
2010 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-360-017567999