지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
As a tentative proposition this paper suggests a long-distance travel of a mythical cycle or a myth(eme) that couldn't be found out its origin, even though the similarity among the myths are so striking but the countries to which the myth(eme) belonged are far from each other.
Myth of struggling Buddha-Maitreya is very the case in hand. This myth have been founded out by the scholars in many Asian countries like Korea, Japan, Mongolia, China, and even in the tribal minority of their countries. Specially the likeness between Myth(eme)s of struggling Buddha-Maitreya found at Korea and Ryukyu is noteworthy and also well recognised by the scholars from those countries.
Because the Buddhistic hew of the myth(eme)s are so distinct, some scholar have insisted that the Myth(eme)s are of Buddhist origin or derived from the buddhist texts. But such argument easily lost their credibility for destitute of convincing evidences. And the story's backbone that describes the struggling and cheating between Buddha and Maitreya is totally out of Buddhist doctirinal context. In many way, thus, we can conclude that the Buddhism is not a spring fountain at all to give a source to the story, but could be a vehicle to convey or spread out the myths over the world.
Buddhist story of J?taka will be one possible answer for the question how the Buddhism could be a vehicle to convey the Myths of Buddha-Maitreya to many countries. J?taka is so flexible literary genre among other Buddhist literatures that heterogenic elements are easily allowed to come inside and turned out to be the Buddhistic. This point will be well testified when it comes to consider the various local versions of R?m?ya?a story in J?taka format.
In a big scale of hindu myth that, however, should have to includes the vedic cycle of myth, R?m?ya?a recapitulates the cycle of struggling Deva-Asura which is so archaic source as to go back to Indo-Iranian myths or even to Indo-European myths.
At this comparitive sight on hindu myths, we have a very small fraction of fossil to trace back the origin of the Myth of Buddha-Maitreya Struggling.
Myth of struggling Buddha-Maitreya is very the case in hand. This myth have been founded out by the scholars in many Asian countries like Korea, Japan, Mongolia, China, and even in the tribal minority of their countries. Specially the likeness between Myth(eme)s of struggling Buddha-Maitreya found at Korea and Ryukyu is noteworthy and also well recognised by the scholars from those countries.
Because the Buddhistic hew of the myth(eme)s are so distinct, some scholar have insisted that the Myth(eme)s are of Buddhist origin or derived from the buddhist texts. But such argument easily lost their credibility for destitute of convincing evidences. And the story's backbone that describes the struggling and cheating between Buddha and Maitreya is totally out of Buddhist doctirinal context. In many way, thus, we can conclude that the Buddhism is not a spring fountain at all to give a source to the story, but could be a vehicle to convey or spread out the myths over the world.
Buddhist story of J?taka will be one possible answer for the question how the Buddhism could be a vehicle to convey the Myths of Buddha-Maitreya to many countries. J?taka is so flexible literary genre among other Buddhist literatures that heterogenic elements are easily allowed to come inside and turned out to be the Buddhistic. This point will be well testified when it comes to consider the various local versions of R?m?ya?a story in J?taka format.
In a big scale of hindu myth that, however, should have to includes the vedic cycle of myth, R?m?ya?a recapitulates the cycle of struggling Deva-Asura which is so archaic source as to go back to Indo-Iranian myths or even to Indo-European myths.
At this comparitive sight on hindu myths, we have a very small fraction of fossil to trace back the origin of the Myth of Buddha-Maitreya Struggling.
목차
Ⅰ. 이끄는 글
Ⅱ. 한국 무가에 나타난 석가 · 미륵의 투쟁
Ⅲ. 불교문헌 속의 석가와 미륵의 관계
Ⅳ. 불교 속에 들어온 힌두교 서사시, 라마야나
Ⅴ. 라마야나에서 석가 · 미륵의 투쟁신화로
참고문헌
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
식민지시대의 한국 신화의 위상
비평문학
2009 .03
-
한ㆍ중 건국 시조신화 비교 연구 : 상고시대 신화를 중심으로
우리말글
2008 .08
-
중국의 신화와 역사 : 고대 왕조신화의 역사화를 중심으로
한국학(구 정신문화연구)
2000 .03
-
신화(myth)와 철학
철학연구
1987 .06
-
맥락적 해석에 의한 김알지 신화와 신라문화의 정체성 재인식
비교민속학
2007 .02
-
Symbolic Meanings of Dan-Gun Myth : SOME Social and Cultural Implications of the Myth of the Origin of Korea
Theology and The World
2006 .09
-
中國神話의 歷史化에 관한 試論
중국어문학논집
2002 .06
-
The Myth of Tan`gun : A Dramatic Structural Analysis of a Korean Foundation Myth
Korea Journal
1997 .03
-
탈가부장적 신화 읽기의 전략들 : 텍스트의 전복, 해체, 확장
종교문화연구
2015 .12
-
Living Myths in Modern Korean Literature
Korea Journal
1968 .09
-
고대 중동과 구약 신화의 관점에서 본 단군 신화의 해석
고조선단군학
2006 .06
-
신화 이해의 역사적 변천 : 북한의 경우를 중심으로
한국학(구 정신문화연구)
2000 .03
-
올바른 정체성 형성을 위한 신화 식별 방법론 고찰
연세상담코칭연구
2015 .03
-
중국 소수민족의 주요 創世神話에 보이는 천지형상과 補天神話의 연구
중국어문논역총간
2016 .07
-
서사무가를 통해 본 한국 신화의 시간인식체계 연구
겨레어문학
2014 .01
-
신화ㆍ역사ㆍ아이덴티티 : 일본 記紀神話의 古層
한국학(구 정신문화연구)
2000 .03
-
神話로 본 우리 고유사상
중국어문학논집
2002 .06
-
단군신화와 서양신화의 비교연구 : 여성학적 해석을 중심으로
종교문화연구
2002 .10
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-380-015982034