지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This study discussed the legalistic aspects of the Japanese Special Zone Restructuring Law designed for the improving national economy through revitalization of the regional economics based on a reform in regulation. And the Japanese situation, in which various subjects were allowed to apply for the status of a special zone encouraging their active participation, was also examined to review the suggestions given to us. Such a special zone system was created in response to the individual local governments' regional features and needs of its residents, and can be called 'multiple systems within a country'.
'Multiple systems within a country' will allow a specific region to experiment with a new model of local autonomy, and can be applied to other regions if it works well. Even if it proves to be problematic, it may still give an opportunity to reexamine the problems for improvement over time. Both the special zone systems of Japan and Korea are based on such ideas as described above.
Special zone system is closely related to decentralization and can be considered in two respects. One is the aspect of decentralization and the other is that of democratism. And it is also closely related to the acceleration of decentralization. However, constitutional rights of equality and legalistic review on the relationship between the deregulation are some of the aspects that needs careful consideration. And the law governing the special zoning has an aspect of experimental law in that the regional success is being further utilized to bring forth the national development.
Active participation by the entire local governments of all levels are required so that this exemption law enforced by the Government may not fail miserably after a good start. Also the Government should continue to discuss and rectify the measures designed for systematic support for the issues suggested in this study.
'Multiple systems within a country' will allow a specific region to experiment with a new model of local autonomy, and can be applied to other regions if it works well. Even if it proves to be problematic, it may still give an opportunity to reexamine the problems for improvement over time. Both the special zone systems of Japan and Korea are based on such ideas as described above.
Special zone system is closely related to decentralization and can be considered in two respects. One is the aspect of decentralization and the other is that of democratism. And it is also closely related to the acceleration of decentralization. However, constitutional rights of equality and legalistic review on the relationship between the deregulation are some of the aspects that needs careful consideration. And the law governing the special zoning has an aspect of experimental law in that the regional success is being further utilized to bring forth the national development.
Active participation by the entire local governments of all levels are required so that this exemption law enforced by the Government may not fail miserably after a good start. Also the Government should continue to discuss and rectify the measures designed for systematic support for the issues suggested in this study.
목차
Ⅰ. 들어가며
Ⅱ. 지방분권과 규제개혁의 상관관계
Ⅲ. 일본 특구법의 목적과 특색
Ⅳ. 특구법의 법적논거
Ⅴ. 지방자치에 있어서의 특구법의 의의
Ⅵ. 우리나라에의 시사점
Ⅶ. 마치며
〈Abstract〉
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
지방발전을 위한 지역특화발전특구의 발전방안 : 한ㆍ일 비교를 중심으로
국토연구
2003 .09
-
지방분권 개혁의 단계별 제도적 이슈
한국사회와 행정연구
2004 .05
-
참여정부의 지방분권정책의 공법적 과제
공법학연구
2004 .12
-
Decentralization Reform of the Participation Government in Korea : The Process and a Midterm Evaluation of Decentralization Reform
서울행정학회 학술대회 발표논문집
2005 .04
-
일본의 지방분권개혁
지방자치법연구
2010 .01
-
일본 지방분권일괄법의 제정 경위와 추진 성과
지방자치법연구
2017 .01
-
지방분권특별법 및 국가균형발전특별법에 대한 비판적 검토
법과 정책연구
2004 .06
-
일본 지방분권개혁의 성과와 한계: 자치입법권을 중심으로
국정관리연구
2017 .01
-
지방분권과 행정구역개편의 행정법적 문제
공법학연구
2006 .06
-
지방자치단체간 분권연대의 필요성과 가능성 : 대상사업을 중심으로
경기논단
2005 .03
-
정부혁신과 지방분권 개혁: : 한ㆍ일간 비교분석
지방정부연구
2004 .05
-
日本における特区制度の法的分析
지방자치법연구
2016 .01
-
체제전환국의 경제특구 개발과 북한 경제특구 개발에 대한 시사점 : 폴란드와 중국 경제특구 개발의 수요와 공급을 중심으로
국토연구
2004 .09
-
참여정부의 행정분권법제에 대한 평가- 地方自治의 理念과 地方分權 -
지방자치법연구
2005 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-362-016081369