메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국비서학회 비서·사무경영연구 비서학논총 제9권 제2호
발행연도
2000.12
수록면
117 - 137 (21page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
The purpose of this study is to define the current and future roles of secretary.
A three-round Delphi technique was used to collect data through a series of surveys to obtain the consensus of a group of experts in secretarial job. In the first round, and unstructured questionnaire was sent to 52 experts who were qualified to respond to define the secretary's role. Fifty-two experts consist of 17 instructors at colleges, 16 current or former secretaries, and 19 bosses and HRD managers. In the second round, the summarized results of the first round were distributed to 45 round-two respondents to rate the importance of each item for confirmation and validation of the results. In the third, the same procedure as in the second round was repeated to obtain the consensus of the experts on secretary's roles. Data were analyzed using content analysis and descriptive statistics.
The results of this study are summarized as follows:
First, the secretary's current roles are defined as administrative assistant, communication expert, planning manager, human relations manager, information manager, office manager, public relations manager, training manager, training manager, facilitator, customer relations manager, and business partner.
Second, the secretary's role are defined as multi-functional office professional, information manager, business partner, human relations manager, communication expert, planning manager, facilitator, change agent, customer relations manager, and training manager.
Based on the findings of this study, further research is required to identifying the required competencies of each role. Second, it will be interesting to validate the roles defined by expert panel, to assess the current level of expertise, and to rate the importance weighting by secretaries who are now employing.

목차

Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 이론적 배경
Ⅲ. 연구 방법
Ⅳ. 연구결과
Ⅴ. 결론
참고문헌
ABSTRACT

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-325-016424034