지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This article is prepared to look again relation between the customary formality and public customary formality with departing from the standpoint that describes writing of the funeral costume book in Wei-Jin-Nan-Bei-Chao(魏晉南北朝) period as a means of preservation of the species and opinion that the then customary formality is independent right of Shidafu(士大夫) confronting with public law. That's because if we appreciate the then funeral costume book is just confronting with public law, it reduces the utility of ritual study and disregards consciousness stream of Shidafu that they prescribed themselves as a ruler. Also it's impossible to explain deployment of ritual study which was trying to realize ritual world including all of members. Therefore in this text, by chasing the procedure funeral costume manners was settled, it is confirmed that the then funeral costume manners complemented the part that the public customary formalities didn't reach.
The excessive formality prevalent in the end of later Han(漢) is exterminated in the Jin(晉) period. The situation appeared when the five-rites is established by the nation. The nation could practice the state-led standard creation, execution and sanctions by enacting five-rites and a lawㆍpeerage systemㆍofficial regulations. This means the circumstance that Shidafu makes a social standard is finished and the nation is the final decision maker of courtesy and responsible for judgement. Actually the revised New-rites declared the direct interference for the customary formality which was exercised independently.
Then how did the Shidafu react for these changed situation? Until now, many researchers presumed that public system impinged on the autonomy of private world and Shidafu made funeral costume book which was expedient for private world. But through JinShu Lizhi(『晉書』『禮志』), we could confirm though the necessity of establishment of funeral costume manners arose from a specific family firstly, it was decided by an unbiased view of royal court finally. Then we'll have to presume that the funeral costume manners in the Jin period was responsible for enriching the contents of public customary formality in addition to a role of family-law.
This could be confirmed more definitely by analyzing then a series of funeral costume book. We could know that Shidafu was trying to discover suitability of their action through the rites scriptures. As State cults are established by nation, customary action is restricted, an exception of courtesy practice happened with unprecedented vortex and feudal peerage system was revived, Shidafu would realize the need of ceremony based on the class and so analyze the rites scriptures again. They tried to complete the integrated national rites code in addition to make and apply independent and individual standard for courtesy. Also it might be another cause of compilation of funeral costume book that funeral costume manners done wrongly was also an factor of degradation and deprivation of government post as funeral costume manners that filial piety was expressed extremely became an important factor to select talented people. Namely for Shidafu, as it was the most important social activity to comply with funeral costume manners and practice the normative action based on specific position and role required socially, research and annotation for the rites scriptures which becomes base for act was done continuously.
The excessive formality prevalent in the end of later Han(漢) is exterminated in the Jin(晉) period. The situation appeared when the five-rites is established by the nation. The nation could practice the state-led standard creation, execution and sanctions by enacting five-rites and a lawㆍpeerage systemㆍofficial regulations. This means the circumstance that Shidafu makes a social standard is finished and the nation is the final decision maker of courtesy and responsible for judgement. Actually the revised New-rites declared the direct interference for the customary formality which was exercised independently.
Then how did the Shidafu react for these changed situation? Until now, many researchers presumed that public system impinged on the autonomy of private world and Shidafu made funeral costume book which was expedient for private world. But through JinShu Lizhi(『晉書』『禮志』), we could confirm though the necessity of establishment of funeral costume manners arose from a specific family firstly, it was decided by an unbiased view of royal court finally. Then we'll have to presume that the funeral costume manners in the Jin period was responsible for enriching the contents of public customary formality in addition to a role of family-law.
This could be confirmed more definitely by analyzing then a series of funeral costume book. We could know that Shidafu was trying to discover suitability of their action through the rites scriptures. As State cults are established by nation, customary action is restricted, an exception of courtesy practice happened with unprecedented vortex and feudal peerage system was revived, Shidafu would realize the need of ceremony based on the class and so analyze the rites scriptures again. They tried to complete the integrated national rites code in addition to make and apply independent and individual standard for courtesy. Also it might be another cause of compilation of funeral costume book that funeral costume manners done wrongly was also an factor of degradation and deprivation of government post as funeral costume manners that filial piety was expressed extremely became an important factor to select talented people. Namely for Shidafu, as it was the most important social activity to comply with funeral costume manners and practice the normative action based on specific position and role required socially, research and annotation for the rites scriptures which becomes base for act was done continuously.
목차
序論
Ⅰ. 魏晉時期 過禮 행위의 근절
Ⅱ. 晉初 五禮의 제정과 國家 주도의 禮治
Ⅲ. 晉代 國法과 喪服禮의 관계
Ⅳ. 晉代 喪服書의 성격과 역할
結論
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
『예기』와 선진 제자서의 상례 비교
율곡학연구
2019 .01
-
한국 상장례의 변화와 친환경적 장묘산업
원불교사상과종교문화
2019 .03
-
근대 이행기 독일 선교사들의 한국 상례에 대한 인식
지방사와 지방문화
2015 .11
-
일생의례의 축제성 : 장례의 경우
비교민속학
2009 .08
-
전통 상례의 변화를 통해 본 일재의 조선 인식 : 일제강점기 신문, 잡지 기사를 중심으로
어문론집
2012 .12
-
[Funeral Rites] Death of an Yi Court-lady
Korea Journal
1968 .03
-
다산 예학의 학문적 위상 -『상례사전』을 중심으로-
다산과 현대
2019 .12
-
한국 상장풍속에 담긴 제 문화요소와 그 의미를 토대로 한 문화교육 방안연구
아시아문화연구
2012 .03
-
춘향가 사설의 옷차림 형상과 인물화 연구
어문학
2009 .09
-
일본 전통의 불교식 葬禮文化와 그 변화 양상
불교학연구
2011 .01
-
베트남 전통상례를 통해 본 한국과 베트남의 죽음관 비교
생명연구
2009 .01
-
由中國殯喪禮看中國殯喪等級制度的演變
중국학
2017 .01
-
1970년대 이후 천안지역 상여제작업의 활동과 특징
민속학연구
2011 .12
-
한국 고대 복식 연구방법 試論
고조선단군학
2003 .06
-
Change in Funeral Customs in Contemporary Korea
Korea Journal
1996 .06
-
儀禮와 敎育 : 冠ㆍ婚ㆍ喪ㆍ祭禮를 中心으로
비교민속학
2003 .08
-
吉祭의 정치적 성격
비교민속학
2004 .02
-
유교의 상례와 죽음의 의미
철학탐구
2004 .10
-
현대 한국의 장례의식에 나타난 죽음관
종교연구
2006 .06
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-910-014847181