메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국노어노문학회 노어노문학 노어노문학 제17권 제2호
발행연도
2005.8
수록면
313 - 350 (38page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
The object of this paper is to analyze several polemical points between a well-known Russian aesthetic theorist Mkhail Mikhailovich Bakhtin and some scientific philosophies of his age. Strange as it may sound, Bakhtin always considered himself as a philosopher rather than simply a literary theorist. Although scientific philosophical writings are very insufficient in his works, every concept of his writings about literary criticism certainly has the potential to be grown up as a proper component of a whole philosophical system, that is, a kind of philosophy of ontological phenomenalism. As remarked Sergey Bocharov, one of Bakhtin's friends and leading researchers, the main theme of his world view can be defined as the 'personification' of meaning through embodiment of voice and author. Most evidently in his early philosophical fragments(「Philosophy toward an act」,「Author and hero in Aesthetic activities」) was revealed the main orientation of his entire philosophical research, but in his subsequent writings too, can be witnessed practically the tracks of the same orientation. According to Bakhtin, any genuine question about a human life certainly transcends all kinds of ethics and theorem, because a human being, who is to be defined as a moral being, has to be related to more a practical consciousness grounded by one's own experiences (or non alibi in one's own being) rather than such an abstract being as defined by various scientific philosophies. Therefore it was the great task for Bakhtin to overcome all difficulties resulting from the schism between the concept of a human being as a genuine moral being, and all kinds of abstract definition which were being produced by various philosophical thoughts in his times, including several leading scientific philosophies such as vitalism, Bergsonism. But at the same time, in the course of polemical controversy parts of those thoughts had a favourable influence upon Bakhtin's thoughts. An explicit example of such an influence is a russian physiologist, A.A. Ukhtornsky's theory of dominant, the clear influence of which can be found in Bakhtin's all religious remarks from the early writings to the later works, including「Problems of Dostoevsky's Poetics」,「Rablais and his world」

목차

Ⅰ. 들어가는 말
Ⅱ. 생기론과 베르그송주의
Ⅲ. 우흐똠스끼와 도미난트 이론
Ⅳ. 나가는 말
참고문헌
Abstract

참고문헌 (18)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-892-014916017