메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국노어노문학회 노어노문학 노어노문학 제17권 제3호
발행연도
2005.12
수록면
97 - 133 (37page)

이용수

DBpia Top 10%동일한 주제분류 기준으로
최근 2년간 이용수 순으로 정렬했을 때
해당 논문이 위치하는 상위 비율을 의미합니다.
표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
It has often been pointed out that Notes from the Underground represents an attack on the views of radical utilitarian thinker Chernyshevsky and a response to his novel What Is to Be Done. In this respect, comparatively little attention has been devoted to the fact that Notes from the Underground reveals human psychology as well.
A close examination of the text shows that Notes from the Underground has perhaps the most complex narrational structure of all Dostoevsky's works. Part One, told from the point of view of the older Underground Man, is straightforward. Part Two, however, works on several narrational planes at the same time, relating the ideas and feeling of Underground Man sixteen years ago, as they are remembered by a now much older narrator about his present and past selves. As a result of this narrative situation a significant ironic distance is established between the Underground Man's younger and older selves. This ironic distance is especially important because it is the author's most effective means of bringing out the differences between the experiencing and narrating personae on which the Underground Man's possibility for self-deception is based. This is the reason why both the philosophy and the psychology of Underground Man are in detail studied. The reason that the Underground Man is created not only as an underground philosopher, but as a man of complex psychology is to make a considerable point of human nature, which is irrational. The Underground Man deceives even himself by the various devices, rationalization, exaggeration, and daydreaming, for instance. In lying to himself and listening to his own lies, the Underground Man embroils himself in endless contradictions. He no longer respects himself or others and is completely incapable of love. He has indeed become preoccupied with coarse pleasures and vices. He is easily offended - all because of his self-deception.
An awareness of the Underground Man's psychology, together with his philosophy, emphasizes the significance of the work both as a masterful psychological portrait and as a philosophical manifesto against the radical utilitarian thinkers.

목차

Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 지하인의 기본 사상: 인간의 이성과 자유의지
Ⅲ. 지하인의 심리분석: 인간의 비합리성과 자기기만
Ⅳ. 인간 철학: 도스토예프스키와 체르느이세프스키의 인간 본성론
Ⅴ. 결론
참고문헌
Abstract

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-892-014916597