메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국영화학회 영화연구 영화연구 38호
발행연도
2008.12
수록면
201 - 224 (24page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
The second evaluation in the examination of employment for the middle school teacher in Theater & Film section is given questions by argument type. The argument questions have its object in measuring the problem solving capacity and logic of expression based on the systematical thought on the textual basis. It is able to measure the extensive measurement of thought of examiner by letting it be observed not only in the individual knowledge on text but also based on the logical analogy and general application capacity.
The argument questions are developed so that is able to evaluate the general and integral capacity of understanding of the textual contents, textual course of education, teaching method. For that the detailed factor is meanly reflected based on the 'detail generality of factor of evaluating area and contents'
The textual area of education section is developed focusing on the humanity, capacity, evaluation ability as teacher. In the textual area of contents it is allowed to evaluate the ability to explore the textual related knowledge and activity(example: theater production, film production, film criticism, etc) systematical and logically based on the general and integral comprehension. Specially it is required to evaluate if it can put both of them together as it is required to have the knowledge and experience not only of theory but also of practice of theater & film.
Also, it is allowed to develop the questions to evaluate the ability to present the alternative create and logically based on the fact and the investigated information after revising the various points of textual issues(issue of textual contents, issue of textual teaching methode), and to make questions out evenly throughout the corresponding area not focused on the special area or theory.
The second examination should be able to evaluate the logicality of hard structure of answer paper, expression skill, rationality of argument development which are not easy to measure in the first examination (selection type).

목차

1. 논술문항 개발의 목적 및 방향
2. 논술형 평가도구 개발원칙
3. 평가영역 및 평가내용 요소가 출제에 고르게 반영될 수 있는 방안
4. 평가의 공정성 확보를 위한 방안
5. 논술형 평가도구 개발방법
6. 논술형 문항 채점방법
참고문헌
Abstract

참고문헌 (23)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0