지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The purpose of this study is to analyze, comparatively, the jointly published history textbooks made as part of civil interchange between Korea, China, and Japan, or between Korea and Japan, and to study the possibility of a shared perception of history in East Asia and some points of caution thereof.
『The History of Korea-Japan Interchange』 was written with its focus set on the history of interchange between Korea and Japan. 『The History of Korea and Japan, Face to Face』 takes the approach of comparing the history and culture of the two countries and helps the youth of both countries understand and respect one another. Over the course of writing the book, there was controversy over how just to perceive the 'Japanese invaders' , and a sufficient agreement on this matter was never reached amongst the two countries. 『History that Opens the Future』 reconstructed the modem and contemporary history of Korea, China, and Japan, from the more general perspective of peace and human rights. On the one hand, the contents of this book were structured following the conflict angle of invasion and resistance, and on the other hand, it described the independent modernization efforts and social and cultural changes of each country in a parallel manner so as to help understand one another. The main points of discussion included the authenticity of the statistical data on the compulsory mobilization and massacre by Japan, and the characteristics of the foreign pressure placed on Joseon by the Qing Dynasty in the late 19th century. 『Gender Perspective on Modem and Contemporary History of Korea and Japan』 discusses the modem and contemporary history of Korea and Japan from the 'gender' point of view.
Through such joint publications of historical textbooks the basis for reflection and reconciliation at the civil society level in East Asia with regards to the invasions and military conflicts of the past has been established. In order to enhance the level of sharing in our perception of history in the future, we must go through the process of 'communication' so as to understand the other more deeply. The most important issue is how to overcome narrow-minded nationalism. It is impossible to rid ourselves of nationalism overnight. Efforts on all parties to create an identity for themselves as members of the larger East Asian community whilst maintaining their own national sense of identity is required.
『The History of Korea-Japan Interchange』 was written with its focus set on the history of interchange between Korea and Japan. 『The History of Korea and Japan, Face to Face』 takes the approach of comparing the history and culture of the two countries and helps the youth of both countries understand and respect one another. Over the course of writing the book, there was controversy over how just to perceive the 'Japanese invaders' , and a sufficient agreement on this matter was never reached amongst the two countries. 『History that Opens the Future』 reconstructed the modem and contemporary history of Korea, China, and Japan, from the more general perspective of peace and human rights. On the one hand, the contents of this book were structured following the conflict angle of invasion and resistance, and on the other hand, it described the independent modernization efforts and social and cultural changes of each country in a parallel manner so as to help understand one another. The main points of discussion included the authenticity of the statistical data on the compulsory mobilization and massacre by Japan, and the characteristics of the foreign pressure placed on Joseon by the Qing Dynasty in the late 19th century. 『Gender Perspective on Modem and Contemporary History of Korea and Japan』 discusses the modem and contemporary history of Korea and Japan from the 'gender' point of view.
Through such joint publications of historical textbooks the basis for reflection and reconciliation at the civil society level in East Asia with regards to the invasions and military conflicts of the past has been established. In order to enhance the level of sharing in our perception of history in the future, we must go through the process of 'communication' so as to understand the other more deeply. The most important issue is how to overcome narrow-minded nationalism. It is impossible to rid ourselves of nationalism overnight. Efforts on all parties to create an identity for themselves as members of the larger East Asian community whilst maintaining their own national sense of identity is required.
목차
Ⅰ. 머리말
Ⅱ. 공동역사교재들의 특징과 쟁점
Ⅲ. 역사인식 공유의 진전을 위한 과제
Ⅳ. 맺음말
Abstract
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
[총설] 최근의 한중관계사·한일관계사 연구의 쇄도와 새로운 동양사 연구 방향의 탐색
역사학보
2014 .09
-
동북아 시대에서 한국사 서술과 역사교육 : ‘국사’를 넘어서
역사교육
2005 .09
-
한국 역사학의 재구성을 위한 방법으로서 동아시아사
동북아역사논총
2013 .06
-
한ㆍ일 중학교 역사교과서의 근대사 서술 분석 : 한ㆍ일 관계를 중심으로
계명사학
2008 .11
-
동아시아 역사상, 그 구축의 방식과 윤곽
역사학보
2008 .12
-
「동아시아사로서의 한국사」구성을 위한 再論
한국사학보
2009 .02
-
世界史 敎科書 敍述에서 東아시아史 談論의 問題 : 中國 世界史 敎科書의 境遇
역사교육
2002 .12
-
동아시아사 교과서에서 동아시아사와 세계사 연계 방안
동북아역사논총
2013 .06
-
『고등학교 국사』 및 『한국근ㆍ현대사』 교과서의 동아시아사 서술 분석
역사교육
2009 .06
-
전근대 국사의 형성과 그 발전
韓國史學史學報
2008 .01
-
최근 중등학교 역사 교육과정 개정에 따른 세계사 과목의 편제와 내용 구성의 변화
역사교육
2011 .12
-
동아시아사 교육의 연구동향 분석 : 근현대사를 중심으로
동북아역사논총
2016 .09
-
역사교육 계열화를 위한 고등학교 국사교육 내용구성 방안
역사와 담론
2005 .04
-
‘학습부담 경감’으로 포장된 역사교육의 퇴행 : 세계사와 동아시아사 내용 구성의 문제점
역사비평
2015 .11
-
〈동아시아사〉 과목의 신설과 교육과정 개발
역사교육
2013 .12
-
한·일 역사교과서 협의 사례 연구
일어일문학
2013 .11
-
한국에서 동양사의 유통과 소비
역사와경계
2006 .06
-
미국, 영국, 일본의 역사교육과정 동향
역사교육
1999 .09
-
일본 세계사 교육의 동아시아사
동북아역사논총
2008 .03
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0