지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Since full privatization and rapid deregulation in the telecommunications industry, it has been key issue for the regulatory regime to ensure effective competition. During this transitory period from state monopoly to private competition, the Telecommunications Business Act("TBA") prescribes various asymmetrical regulations like local loop unbundling, interconnection, and duty to grant access to transmission networks etc. Along with these, the Ministry of Information and Communication("MIC") regulates not only wholesale prices for other operators and interconnect rates but also end-users' retail prices, which is likely to leave little room for business operators to compete with each other in terms of their attractive rates. This suggests that rate coordination between operators facilitated or motivated by administrative guidance should not be subject to cartel sanction which requires as prerequisite operators' right to decide their own price.
From substantive point of view, it seems therefore skeptical to mechanically apply cartel prohibition to such rate negotiation among private operators and regulatory agency. per-se approach is not allowed, restriction of remaining competition not necessarily expected, and any common intent to gain monopoly profits not found. The current authorization and notification system of rates in advance of launch encourages price following and moreover tacit collusion to keep the rates higher th an competitive level. Furthermore it should be also considered that rates in the telephony market are to decide to a level sufficient to provide universal service seamlessly.
In this respect, the overlapping jurisdiction over cartel behaviors between MIC and Korea Fair Trade Commission("KFTC") should be harmonized primarily under following these: "Without competition, a restraint of it is unthinkable". That implies from the competition policy perspective that creating competition has full priority to protecting any kind of competition. That is, given TBA does not contain any prohibition of cartels and in practice MIC uses mandatory rate coordination, KFTC should restrain itself from applying its dogmatic cartel concept.
From substantive point of view, it seems therefore skeptical to mechanically apply cartel prohibition to such rate negotiation among private operators and regulatory agency. per-se approach is not allowed, restriction of remaining competition not necessarily expected, and any common intent to gain monopoly profits not found. The current authorization and notification system of rates in advance of launch encourages price following and moreover tacit collusion to keep the rates higher th an competitive level. Furthermore it should be also considered that rates in the telephony market are to decide to a level sufficient to provide universal service seamlessly.
In this respect, the overlapping jurisdiction over cartel behaviors between MIC and Korea Fair Trade Commission("KFTC") should be harmonized primarily under following these: "Without competition, a restraint of it is unthinkable". That implies from the competition policy perspective that creating competition has full priority to protecting any kind of competition. That is, given TBA does not contain any prohibition of cartels and in practice MIC uses mandatory rate coordination, KFTC should restrain itself from applying its dogmatic cartel concept.
목차
Ⅰ. 머리말
Ⅱ. 통신시장 요금규제와 경쟁질서
Ⅲ. 요금규제와 카르텔
Ⅳ. 통신법과 공정거래법의 관계
Ⅴ. 맺는 말
[Abstract]
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
The Issue of Information Exchanges Regarding Price under Competition Law : Comments on the Supreme Court’s Judgment on the Ramen Cartel from a Comparative Perspective
법학논총
2016 .07
-
경쟁정책에서 경제적 자유와 효율성 간의 상충관계
질서경제저널
2017 .01
-
유선전화 요금체계와 경쟁정책
규제연구
2006 .06
-
카르텔 규제의 형사적 집행 효과에 관한 의문들: 공정거래법 전면개편안의 전속 고발권 폐지 관련 내용을 중심으로
고려법학
2019 .01
-
The Future of Asian Competition Law - A Proposal for Modernisation -
동북아법연구
2018 .01
-
담합규제 개선방향 : 공동행위의 부당성 판단기준을 중심으로
규제연구
2014 .04
-
중국 반독점법상 카르텔 규제의 쟁점과 사례 분석
중국과 중국학
2013 .02
-
WTO 레짐의 형성과 경쟁정책 : 한국정보통신시장에 있어서 국가의 재조정
21세기정치학회보
2003 .12
-
통신요금인가제의 정당성 판단기준과 개선 방안 : 이동통신서비스를 중심으로
경제규제와 법
2014 .11
-
교통요금규제의 운임수준에 미치는 영향분석 연구
규제연구
2003 .06
-
글로벌경쟁정책과 무역 이슈의 최근 동향
통상법률
2011 .10
-
부당한 공동행위의 성립 : 사례연구
서강법학
2008 .06
-
국제카르텔 제재의 국제적 수렴현상
법학논집
2013 .01
-
오늘날의 관점에서 본 호프만-칸첸바흐 논쟁
질서경제저널
2015 .01
-
상식과 직관에 부합하는 경제분석의 필요성- 경성카르텔에 시장획정을 요구하는 대법원 판례에 대한 코멘트 -
고려법학
2016 .01
-
인도(India)의 경쟁법과 경쟁정책
법과 정책연구
2010 .01
-
전기통신사업법상 소매규제의 개편방안
경제규제와 법
2008 .11
-
카르텔과 시장진입제한의 효율성
산업혁신연구
2012 .01
-
A Critical Review of Competition Law on Abuse of Market Dominance in The Southeast Asian Developing Countries : A Comparative Perspective
강원법학
2014 .02
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0