메뉴 건너뛰기
내서재 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
대한건축학회 대한건축학회 논문집 - 계획계 大韓建築學會論文集 計劃系 第25卷 第4號 KCI Excellent Accredited Journal
발행연도
2009.4
수록면
63 - 72 (10page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
The purpose of this study is to analyze how the entertainment elements is applied to the design and whether there is a difference between the facility types. The object is restricted to four representative Urban Entertainment Centers in Seoul. They are divided into horizontal and hybrid type in accordance with the tenants arrangement. The study was progressed through the case analysis by the records and the field survey.
The result is as follows; 1) it is a result about the ambient entertainment. The horizontal is an underground mall with a passage from a main entrance to a terminus and the various nodes at turning points. The hybrid has a passage from an open-space on the ground or a deck above vertically to the top of building and an outside node connecting to separate buildings on the middle-floor. 2) It is a result about destination entertainment. All cases have in common the fact that they have a category dominant store. But the hybrid has a large discount store on the lower level and more various entertainment destinations including sports facility than horizontal. In the horizontal, retail is in the halfway, dining is around the sub-entrance and entertainment is at a terminus. Compared to it, in the hybrid the location of retail and dining is different on the case-by-case but all entertainment destinations are on the upper floor. The relative area ratio is in order of entertainment-retail-dining(horizontal) and retail-entertainment-dining(hybrid). 3) It is a result about impulse entertainment. It is happened at an entrance, passage, and node. Especially the passage of the horizontal type and the entrance of hybrid are utilized for impulse.

목차

Abstract
1. 서론
2. 문헌고찰
3. 사례분석 및 결과
4. 결론
참고문헌

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-540-019491234