지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The Royal Secretariat-Chancellery(中書門下省), the Department of state affairs(尙書省) and the Security Council(中樞院ㆍ樞密院) were the essential political institutions which administered the all the affairs of Goryeo court.
It was characteristic of Goryeo dynasty for government officials to hold concurrent posts if they were appointed to take an additional duties, or even have two or more posts assigned to them simultaneously. For example, those who held one of the posts of Grand Councilor of the Royal Secretariat-Chancellery(宰臣) were routinely assigned to posts within the Controller for Six Ministries(6部判事) as well. The Grand Councilors of rank 2b(從2品) and below, as well as officials from the Seven posts of the Security Council, would commonly be assigned positions of Vice Director(僕射), Controller for Six Ministries(6部尙書), Chief Attendant(散騎常侍) and Censor-in-Chief(御史大夫).
As different viewpoints have been suggested, the issue that lies here is how one should understand the nature of the structure of the posts of Grand Councilor of the Royal Secretariat-Chancellery and the Seven posts of the Security Council. Furthermore, the question arises, are these posts concurrent positions, in which one post being held by an official is dependant on his other position, or he holds plural posts, in which they are independent from each other? This is an issue which is closely related to understanding the power structure of the dynasty. The former assumption stresses the king’s absolute power over executive officials in his administrative court while the latter emphasizes these officers also maintained a certain degree of power. The theory of concurrent posts is supported by the fact that the king always held final decision, and the Six Ministries of the Department of State Affairs could consult directly with the king without the consent of any higher institutions. However, the Six Ministries were more or less under the Grand Councilors’ influence, as these councilors held the post of Controller of the Ministries. Furthermore, the councilors could practice their influence over appointing Censors, who’s duties were to debate policies, through the verification system.
Considering these points, it would be more appropriate to regard the posts of Grand Councilor of the Royal Secretariat-Chancellery and the Seven posts of the Security Council as independent, because their opinion could affect the king’s decisions. Although the Goryeo kings had less control over the dynasty than the Joseon kings, it is evident that the well balanced power between the king and his highest officers was the defining feature that shaped the whole Goryeo government.
It was characteristic of Goryeo dynasty for government officials to hold concurrent posts if they were appointed to take an additional duties, or even have two or more posts assigned to them simultaneously. For example, those who held one of the posts of Grand Councilor of the Royal Secretariat-Chancellery(宰臣) were routinely assigned to posts within the Controller for Six Ministries(6部判事) as well. The Grand Councilors of rank 2b(從2品) and below, as well as officials from the Seven posts of the Security Council, would commonly be assigned positions of Vice Director(僕射), Controller for Six Ministries(6部尙書), Chief Attendant(散騎常侍) and Censor-in-Chief(御史大夫).
As different viewpoints have been suggested, the issue that lies here is how one should understand the nature of the structure of the posts of Grand Councilor of the Royal Secretariat-Chancellery and the Seven posts of the Security Council. Furthermore, the question arises, are these posts concurrent positions, in which one post being held by an official is dependant on his other position, or he holds plural posts, in which they are independent from each other? This is an issue which is closely related to understanding the power structure of the dynasty. The former assumption stresses the king’s absolute power over executive officials in his administrative court while the latter emphasizes these officers also maintained a certain degree of power. The theory of concurrent posts is supported by the fact that the king always held final decision, and the Six Ministries of the Department of State Affairs could consult directly with the king without the consent of any higher institutions. However, the Six Ministries were more or less under the Grand Councilors’ influence, as these councilors held the post of Controller of the Ministries. Furthermore, the councilors could practice their influence over appointing Censors, who’s duties were to debate policies, through the verification system.
Considering these points, it would be more appropriate to regard the posts of Grand Councilor of the Royal Secretariat-Chancellery and the Seven posts of the Security Council as independent, because their opinion could affect the king’s decisions. Although the Goryeo kings had less control over the dynasty than the Joseon kings, it is evident that the well balanced power between the king and his highest officers was the defining feature that shaped the whole Goryeo government.
목차
Ⅰ. 머리말
Ⅱ. 兼職과 重複職에 대한 諸家의 견해와 그 문제점
Ⅲ. 宰樞의 兼職과 重複職에 대한 논의의 내용 검토
Ⅳ. 宰樞의 兼職과 重複職을 통해 본 權力構造 검토
Ⅴ. 맺음말
〈ABSTRACT〉
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
Next of “King”
Localities
2016 .11
-
고려 전기 정기적 국왕 행사의 내용과 의미
역사와현실
2013 .03
-
공민왕대 관제개편의 내용 및 의미
역사학보
2009 .03
-
『리차드 2세』: 왕의 말과 왕의 트라우마, 그리고 왕권
신영어영문학
2013 .11
-
[논문] 조선초기 잡직의 형성과 그 변화
역사와현실
2005 .12
-
<용비어천가>의 六祖 서술 양상 고찰
어문연구
2018 .01
-
조선시대 왕의 이중적 재현 : 인조대를 중심으로
한국학연구
2012 .03
-
고려전기 중추원의 설치와 그 성격
역사와현실
2009 .09
-
고려전기 본품행두제(本品行頭制)의 성격
역사와현실
2010 .06
-
『고려사』의 편찬과 조선전기 前朝史인식
사학연구
2014 .12
-
조선시대 국왕호칭의 종류와 의미
역사와경계
2004 .09
-
1802년 순조의 嘉禮에 나타난 국왕의 辛行 연구
장서각
2005 .12
-
[특집:선사비문을 통해 본 나말려초 불교]나말려초 국왕과 불교의 관계
역사와현실
2005 .06
-
重複表現『～化になる』に関する考察
한국일본어학회 학술발표회
2020 .09
-
고려시대 묘지명에 보이는 연대와 호칭 표기방식
한국사학보
2012 .08
-
Joseon Kings’ Personal Belief in Buddhism and its Political Significance
THE REVIEW OF KOREAN STUDIES
2011 .03
-
고려국왕의 征東行省 保擧權 장악과 그 의미
史叢(사총)
2017 .01
-
조선중기(연산군~현종) 後宮의 입궁과 사회적 위상
한국사연구
2011 .09
-
高麗時代 宋商 貿易의 再照明
역사교육
2007 .12
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-911-018326817