메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
고려대학교 일민국제관계연구원 국제관계연구 국제관계연구 2008년 가을호 제13권 제2호 (통권 제25호)
발행연도
2008.9
수록면
73 - 99 (27page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
It is noteworthy that the Soviet Union has been proposed for security Council in Europe like CSCE for a long time, with the general understandings of CSCE foundation. This paper has a purpose to grasp the strategic interests of Soviet Union in the process of CSCE establishment and the meanings of Soviet Union's participation in the negotiation process. For the Soviets, the CSCE was a key step in a broad strategy to consolidate their hold on Eastern Europe and to win an additional measure of influence over Western Europe. The CSCE was the most far-reaching, concrete initiative undertaken by the Soviets in carrying out her so called, "peace program." The Communist party was obliged by its own policies to convene its Twenty-fifth Congress, and a successful CSCE was all but essential to demonstrate that the Soviet government had correctly carried out the party's policies. The CSCE also had long been a subject of intense personal interest and commitment for Brezhnev. For accomplishing her objectives, Soviet Union's strategy was to evidently overwhelm the other delegations, to create an irresitible momentum to finish the negotiations, to rush through the work in a general way, and to avoid being tied down in terms of time or language to any very specific discussions or agreements. The Soviets exhorted the Conference to move ahead more rapidly with its work and belittled all efforts to evoke specified as attempts to sidetrack the historic significance of the Conference into meaningless details. These tactics found a certain sympathy among many delegates, she felt the negotiations bogging down. Nevertheless, the CSCE's role as a continuing European institution still has a dynamic enterprise. This institution is broad in scope and membership. flexible, and resistant to the moods of international relations. It has become a forum for debate and discussion between East and West, neutral and engaged, small and large countries, and has proven itself capable of positive contributions, even during periods of East-West tension. It has not been subverted to Soviet objectives-on the contrary, it has been used to advance many Western views-and its possibilities are far from exhausted.

목차

Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. CSCE 형성의 전사(前史): 소련의 제안과정
Ⅲ. 동서간 데탕트에 대한 소련의 인식과 미국과의 협력추구 요인
Ⅳ. 협상경과 및 결과: 소련에 대한 평가
Ⅴ. 결론
【참고문헌】
[ABSTRACT]

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-350-018344812