지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Riding the tide of global economic downturns and its effects, the voice of concerns are looming large, saying that excessive inheritance tax and legal reserve of inheritance are impeding the operational vigor for both small and large enterprises.
Such concerns relate to the issue of how to reconcile the basic principal of inheritance tax and legal reserve, which aim to prevent generational descent of wealth with practical necessity from macroeconomic level. From macroeconomic perspective, in case of inheritors'claims for legal reserve when he/she can maintain certain quality of living in the absence of it, there are social cost of redistribution as well as possibility of reduction of value generation such as growths of corporate firms.
For instance, in case a predecessor with an established small-medium enterprise wishes to inherit a firm to one of his children who has educational background in management, if a group of remaining inheritors except the intended issue executes their right of claim for legal rights, they can collectively execute their right of claim for legal reserves of inheritance, which will work towards their favor. The inheritors may not be interested managing the firm and may sell their stocks to foreign investors resulting in de-facto transfer of the enterprise to foreign stockholders.
Therefore, interpretation and execution of current institution of legal reserve for inheritance need to consider such economic interests at stake, and it would be a worthwhile endeavor to reconsider freedom of predecessor's testament and safety of transactions.
As civil law of Korea does not include specific clauses regarding legal reserve for inheritance, lacking practical solutions to legal problems incurring during execution of return claim of legal reserve, such legal-economic consideration will mark a constructive starting point in developing theories for analysis on execution of rights for claiming inheritance legal reserve.
Such concerns relate to the issue of how to reconcile the basic principal of inheritance tax and legal reserve, which aim to prevent generational descent of wealth with practical necessity from macroeconomic level. From macroeconomic perspective, in case of inheritors'claims for legal reserve when he/she can maintain certain quality of living in the absence of it, there are social cost of redistribution as well as possibility of reduction of value generation such as growths of corporate firms.
For instance, in case a predecessor with an established small-medium enterprise wishes to inherit a firm to one of his children who has educational background in management, if a group of remaining inheritors except the intended issue executes their right of claim for legal rights, they can collectively execute their right of claim for legal reserves of inheritance, which will work towards their favor. The inheritors may not be interested managing the firm and may sell their stocks to foreign investors resulting in de-facto transfer of the enterprise to foreign stockholders.
Therefore, interpretation and execution of current institution of legal reserve for inheritance need to consider such economic interests at stake, and it would be a worthwhile endeavor to reconsider freedom of predecessor's testament and safety of transactions.
As civil law of Korea does not include specific clauses regarding legal reserve for inheritance, lacking practical solutions to legal problems incurring during execution of return claim of legal reserve, such legal-economic consideration will mark a constructive starting point in developing theories for analysis on execution of rights for claiming inheritance legal reserve.
목차
Ⅰ. 들어가면서
Ⅱ. 재산반환방식에 대한 논의
Ⅲ. 증여 목적물이 제3자에게 양도된 경우 반환 방식
Ⅳ. 사례별 구체적 검토
Ⅴ. 글을 맺으며
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (12)
참고문헌 신청
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
유류분청구를 둘러싼 상속세 과세문제에 관한 연구
조세법연구
2010 .08
-
상속회복청구권의 행사기간에 대한 연구
서강법률논총
2012 .02
-
일본 개정 유류분 제도의 내용과 시사점
가족법연구
2019 .01
-
판례상으로 본 상속회복청구권의 상대방
한양법학
2010 .02
-
유류분제도의 연혁 및 입법례에 대한 소고
법학연구
2008 .06
-
민법 제1014조 가액지급청구권
가족법연구
2020 .01
-
자식 없이 사망한 배우자의 재산상속
홍익법학
2018 .01
-
Does Developing Asia Have Too Much Foreign Exchange Reserves? An Empirical Examination
Korea and the World Economy
2010 .04
-
유증의 연구
홍익법학
2010 .01
-
상속공제 적용 한도의 문제점과 개선방안
법학논총
2020 .10
-
농지상속 실태와 정책 과제
한국농촌경제연구원 기본연구보고서
2012 .12
-
신탁제도와 유류분반환청구권과의 관계
가족법연구
2018 .01
-
민법 제999조(상속회복청구권)에 관한 비교법적 연구
법학연구
2016 .05
-
Demand for International Reserves : A Case Study for Korea
Korea and the World Economy
2007 .05
-
상속회복청구권에 관한 몇 가지 문제 : 2002년 개정민법 부칙 제2항의 해석과 대상재산에 대한 상속회복청구를 중심으로
저스티스
2012 .12
-
가업승계 관련 상속세 과세제도의 개선방안 연구
경영법률
2013 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-360-018275363