지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
'Temporary Constitution of Korea' was the fundamental law which had been enacted through the compromise between moderate gruop and right gruop in 'South Korean Interim Legislative Assembly (KILA)'. Therefore this law and the reply of KILA regarding the formation of a Provisional Korean Government to US-USSR Joint Commission gave us the outline of the economic system of the unified Korea. Especially the articles related with economy in 'Temporary Constitution of Korea', which reflected the moderate group's point of view, provided social legislations of various kinds and the article that made possible the participation of labor in corporate management.
Production and distribution was the ground rule of the planed economy system in 'Temporary Constitution of Korea' and the reply of KILA to US-USSR Joint Commission. But the right groups that tried to expend the range of private ownership and management gained their point in the ownership structure and the forms of management. Consequently private ownership and management could be permitted in public and cooperative ownership. This showed the limit of the compromise between moderate and right groups. Right group Im-Hyup expend the range of private ownership and management without the statement about planned distribution in the reply to US-USSR Joint Commission. Both moderate and right groups provided the participation of labor in corporate management based on the harmonization of capital and labor, but it wasn't realistic in actual.
The state pursued by the political power who promoted the coalition between right and left was similar to the social state pursued by social democracy in Europe after World War Ⅱ. And its economic system looked like mixed economy. The economic system in 'Temporary Constitution of Korea' and the reply of KILA to US-USSR Joint Commission, in which the moderate group's point of view were well reflected, was also mixed economy. This system could partly realize communization on the basis of private ownership. And it was the economic system in accordance with the social state which allowed the state control and plan.
If the political moderate group and its support power had been made, on the assumption that unified Korea be free from outside influence, the economic system in the 'Temporary Constitution of Korea' might have become that of social democracy. But the moderate group and Kim Gu negotiated with North Korea for Korea unification, but they failed.
Production and distribution was the ground rule of the planed economy system in 'Temporary Constitution of Korea' and the reply of KILA to US-USSR Joint Commission. But the right groups that tried to expend the range of private ownership and management gained their point in the ownership structure and the forms of management. Consequently private ownership and management could be permitted in public and cooperative ownership. This showed the limit of the compromise between moderate and right groups. Right group Im-Hyup expend the range of private ownership and management without the statement about planned distribution in the reply to US-USSR Joint Commission. Both moderate and right groups provided the participation of labor in corporate management based on the harmonization of capital and labor, but it wasn't realistic in actual.
The state pursued by the political power who promoted the coalition between right and left was similar to the social state pursued by social democracy in Europe after World War Ⅱ. And its economic system looked like mixed economy. The economic system in 'Temporary Constitution of Korea' and the reply of KILA to US-USSR Joint Commission, in which the moderate group's point of view were well reflected, was also mixed economy. This system could partly realize communization on the basis of private ownership. And it was the economic system in accordance with the social state which allowed the state control and plan.
If the political moderate group and its support power had been made, on the assumption that unified Korea be free from outside influence, the economic system in the 'Temporary Constitution of Korea' might have become that of social democracy. But the moderate group and Kim Gu negotiated with North Korea for Korea unification, but they failed.
목차
Ⅰ. 머리말
Ⅱ. 조선임시약헌 경제조항과 남조선과도입법의원 미소공동위원회 답신안의 관계
Ⅲ. 조선임시약헌의 생산체제 - 중간파와 우파의 절충
Ⅳ. 조선임시약헌의 분배체제 - 노자협조와 개량적인 분배의 사회화
Ⅴ. 조선임시약헌의 경제체제 성격
Ⅵ. 맺음말
〈ABSTRACT〉
참고문헌 (62)
참고문헌 신청
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
제헌헌법의 사회ㆍ경제질서 구성 이념
한국사연구
2009 .03
-
고려시대 토지소유관계 재론
역사와현실
2006 .12
-
일제시기 창원군『임야조사서』분석과 소유구조 변화
역사와 담론
2011 .08
-
8ㆍ15 후 좌우세력의 헌법 제정 시도에 대한 사실 관계 해석과 그 정치적 성격 : 민주주의민족전선, 비상국민회의, 민주의원을 중심으로
역사교육
2008 .06
-
우파세력의 單政 立法 시도와 조선임시약헌 제정의 정치적 성격
한국사학보
2007 .08
-
白南雲의 토지소유론과 그 시대적 의미 : 《朝鮮封建社會經濟史(上)》을 중심으로
한국사연구
2009 .06
-
정부수립 후 노동위원회의 설치와 노동문제
동방학지
2008 .01
-
Party-Military Relations in the USSR
슬라브학보
1986 .08
-
북한의 사유제 정착과정과 민간산업정책(1945～1950)
한국사연구
2011 .03
-
Land Reform and Colonial Land Legislation in Korea, 1894–1910
Korea Journal
2014 .09
-
Economic Development and Democracy : Korea as a New Model?
Korea Journal
1995 .06
-
The Errors in Korea’s Constitution and Liberal Constitutionalism
THE REVIEW OF KOREAN STUDIES
2007 .03
-
Capital Structure Decision of Korean Firms in Relation to Their Corporate Ownership Structure and Other Key Variables
성곡논총
1983 .08
-
Economic Development in Korea
Korea Journal
1966 .08
-
[특집3 : 토지조사사업 연구] 조선토지조사사업 연구의 과제와 시론적 검토
역사와현실
2003 .12
-
The Opening of Korea and Changes in Social Thought
Korea Journal
1976 .02
-
소련의 경제개혁과 자본주의세계체제
한신논문집
1994 .11
-
북한문학 형성기의 창작방법의 이념지향 : 趙基天 詩를 중심으로
어문론집
2011 .07
-
Historical Characteristics of Korea's Social Democracy
International Journal of Korean History
2002 .12
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0100-2009-911-018288445