지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The purpose of this paper is to analyze the economic articles which were points at issue when the constitution was drafted and debated in the National Assembly of the Constitution(NAC). And this is to clarify what kind of ideology the political groups of NAC claim in order to organize the social economic order of the Republic of Korea, the separate government.
Above all, for this purpose, it is necessary to explain what the state ownership and the government control economy which were provided in the Constitution of 1948 mean practically. And the cooperation between labor and capital was debated in NAC, based on “the laborer's management participation right to the company” and “the equal right to share profits of the company”. Therefore it is necessary to clarify whether this cooperation between labor and capital is different from that of European social democracy. Also it is important to examine the differences among the representatives who were not members of Korea Democratic Party, in this discussion.
This analysis is to clarify the reality of the economic order and the socialization of means of production which were provided in economic articles of the Constitution of 1948. Also this is to prove the conclusion of the socialization of means of production which the right group permitted in appearance in the liberation space.
Above all, for this purpose, it is necessary to explain what the state ownership and the government control economy which were provided in the Constitution of 1948 mean practically. And the cooperation between labor and capital was debated in NAC, based on “the laborer's management participation right to the company” and “the equal right to share profits of the company”. Therefore it is necessary to clarify whether this cooperation between labor and capital is different from that of European social democracy. Also it is important to examine the differences among the representatives who were not members of Korea Democratic Party, in this discussion.
This analysis is to clarify the reality of the economic order and the socialization of means of production which were provided in economic articles of the Constitution of 1948. Also this is to prove the conclusion of the socialization of means of production which the right group permitted in appearance in the liberation space.
목차
Ⅰ. 머리말
Ⅱ. 한국민주당 주도의 제헌국회 ‘헌법 및 정부조직법 기초위원회’
Ⅲ. 현상 유지 논리의 국유화와 통제경제의 완화 : 사회국가 이념의 허구화
Ⅳ. 노동자 기업경영참가권 및 이익균점권 논쟁 : 사회민주주의의 왜곡과 국가 코포라티즘의 단초
Ⅴ. 맺음말
〈ABSTRACT〉
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
제헌헌법 및 2차 개정 헌법의 경제질서에 대한 인식과 그 지향
사학연구
2008 .03
-
대한민국 제헌헌법의 주권원리와 경제질서
한국사학보
2004 .07
-
박정희 시기의 헌법 정신과 내용의 해석 : 절차, 조항, 개념, 의미를 중심으로
역사비평
2011 .08
-
조선임시약헌의 경제체제 구상
한국사연구
2008 .03
-
The Errors in Korea’s Constitution and Liberal Constitutionalism
THE REVIEW OF KOREAN STUDIES
2007 .03
-
Revisions of the Korean Constitution (Ⅱ)
Korea Journal
1974 .08
-
Revisions of the Korean Constitution (Ⅰ)
Korea Journal
1974 .07
-
민족해방운동의 유산과 민주화운동
역사와현실
2010 .09
-
Constitutional Developments in Korea
THE REVIEW OF KOREAN STUDIES
2003 .12
-
역대 대한민국 헌법의 민주주의와 자유민주적 기본질서
역사와현실
2011 .12
-
우리 헌법사에서 ‘기본권’의 의미 : 그 이상과 현실의 교직交織
역사비평
2011 .08
-
‘자유민주적 기본질서’와 한국의 헌법 이념 : 헌법 전문 개정의 쟁점을 중심으로
인간·환경·미래
2019 .10
-
헌법 전문을 통해 본 대한민국의 과거와 미래
역사비평
2011 .08
-
Economic Development and Democracy : Korea as a New Model?
Korea Journal
1995 .06
-
통일헌법의 이념적 기반과 제정의 원칙들
통일인문학
2018 .12
-
헌법과 국민의 권능
철학연구
2012 .12
-
李承晩 國會議長과 大韓民國 憲法 制定
역사학보
2006 .03
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-911-018339487