메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
朴振東 (한국교육과정평가원)
저널정보
역사학회 역사학보 歷史學報 第205輯
발행연도
2010.3
수록면
37 - 75 (39page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
It is often noted that the content of Korean history as a school subject, especially Contemporary Korean history, has been under the strong in-fluence of the political cause put forward by the state. The highly centralized system of textbook development made the government's control over the content selection of history textbooks possible.
It is not until the 1980s that the importance of teaching Contemporary Korean history came to the fore. This can be attributed to the development of research on Contemporary Korean history. A growing interest in Contemporary Korean history has created a sphere for debates on the way a narrative of the national past in Modem and Contemporary Korean history textbooks is presented.
This paper set out to examine some characteristics of an official guideline for the state-authorized history textbooks. The control over the way a textbook is written has been implemented by a range of standards and criteria for textbook authors, who are commissioned by private publishers.
Unlike the government-published Korean history textbook in the past, the state-authorized history textbooks can be easily exposed to criticism for their treatment of a particular event that is in conflict with the official guideline. While the recent change towards textbook pluralism was welcomed by history teachers and researchers in history education, there has been a tension between a strong and long-standing belief in the need for an authoritatively 'correct' version of history and the emergence of several 'approved' textbooks.
It is thorough this guideline that the government attempts to control over the content of history textbooks. What is at issue here is that historical knowledge itself is historical, open to a renewal of interpretation. Therefore, future directions for the guideline for textbook development need to be addressed not in terms of control based on prescriptive regulations but in terms of a wider consensus based on educational concerns, which can form part of national standard for history education.

목차

Ⅰ. 서언
Ⅱ. 현대사 교육 내용에 대한 ‘집필 지침’의 변천과 쟁점화
Ⅲ. 주제별 현대사 내용 서술의 기준 변천과 국사교과서 서술
Ⅳ. 결어
[참고문헌]
[Abstract]

참고문헌 (47)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2010-911-002883379