지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
At a main subject, Jang Hyuk Chu which came out with the main subject for the Japanese literary world brilliantly has considered the process from proletarian thought to the pro-Japanese writer who sees to Korean writer based on the speech and conduct and the situation of time which became [ which comes to cooperate in a colonial policy of Japan ] an opportunity.
It was based on writing in Japanese at the beginning which made the literary world Jang Hyuk Chu which is the first Korean writer who appears in a Japanese literary world at first was based on writing in Japanese, and the clear creation purpose of self literature.
It is because I began to wish to establish the status in the inside of a Japanese literary world as a one writer, without a "Korean writer" being entitled by him himself.
Since Jang Hyuk Chu came out for the Korean literary world, it did not necessarily come out for the literary world of Tokyo, and it is set in a Korean literary world.
That is, while achieve a debut in a Korean literary world and being evaluated by the literary world of Tokyo to which the man who was completely obscurity crossed the sea suddenly, the rival consciousness raw [ intense ] to a Korean literary world was produced.
The Korean literary world was visible for Jang Hyuk Chu with the petty thing which was inferior to the Japanese literary world to the last.
The turning point of such Jang Hyuk Chu literature can be regarded as 1935 which caused the "literary world plague-bacillus" dispute.
The cause of this dispute was by the conceit of the Jang Hyuk Chu literature which considered that a Korean literary world and its writer were things lower than themselves who is playing an active part in a Japanese literary world and there, and haughty character. But, the reason for having been also ignorantly over the Korean literature of the literary world people of Japan which flattered him as "a writer representing Korea" cannot be disregarded there, either. In my idea, imagination of since it was cut by the further success-in-life avarice in a literary world when the wave of militalization of Japan, it is considered that would follow the same route as the "literary world plague-bacillus" dispute in 1933 to 1935 which also considered pro-Japanese sentimentalization for Jang Hyuk Chu this time also begins to have attained to literary men is realized.
It was based on writing in Japanese at the beginning which made the literary world Jang Hyuk Chu which is the first Korean writer who appears in a Japanese literary world at first was based on writing in Japanese, and the clear creation purpose of self literature.
It is because I began to wish to establish the status in the inside of a Japanese literary world as a one writer, without a "Korean writer" being entitled by him himself.
Since Jang Hyuk Chu came out for the Korean literary world, it did not necessarily come out for the literary world of Tokyo, and it is set in a Korean literary world.
That is, while achieve a debut in a Korean literary world and being evaluated by the literary world of Tokyo to which the man who was completely obscurity crossed the sea suddenly, the rival consciousness raw [ intense ] to a Korean literary world was produced.
The Korean literary world was visible for Jang Hyuk Chu with the petty thing which was inferior to the Japanese literary world to the last.
The turning point of such Jang Hyuk Chu literature can be regarded as 1935 which caused the "literary world plague-bacillus" dispute.
The cause of this dispute was by the conceit of the Jang Hyuk Chu literature which considered that a Korean literary world and its writer were things lower than themselves who is playing an active part in a Japanese literary world and there, and haughty character. But, the reason for having been also ignorantly over the Korean literature of the literary world people of Japan which flattered him as "a writer representing Korea" cannot be disregarded there, either. In my idea, imagination of since it was cut by the further success-in-life avarice in a literary world when the wave of militalization of Japan, it is considered that would follow the same route as the "literary world plague-bacillus" dispute in 1933 to 1935 which also considered pro-Japanese sentimentalization for Jang Hyuk Chu this time also begins to have attained to literary men is realized.
목차
要旨
1. 問題提起
2. 張赫宙の?換点
3. 「私に待望する人へ」
4. 文壇ペスト菌
5. 結論
?考文?
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
사회제도 속의 문학생태계와 문학교육의 과제
문학교육학
2013 .01
-
설창수론 : ‘전인(全人)’의 문학과 의지의 언어
우리문학연구
2016 .07
-
한국문학 연구의 미래
국어국문학
2004 .09
-
문학장과 문학성
외국문학연구
2004 .08
-
식민지시대 세대논쟁 연구 －문학제도의 물질적 조건을 중심으로－
우리문학연구
2004 .12
-
문학적 가치 판단의 객관성 문제
새한영어영문학
2003 .11
-
At the End of the World
Korea Journal
1967 .02
-
장일우(張一宇) 문학 비평 연구
한국현대문학연구
2005 .06
-
Literary Expressions of the Korean War
Korea Journal
1971 .06
-
Some Thoughts on Korean and American Literary Situation
Korea Journal
1965 .07
-
문학 교재 구성에서 문학사 교육의 재인식
우리말글
2008 .12
-
1950년대 전향자－문인의 자기서사 재구성 양상: 김기진, 백철의 문단회고를 중심으로
현대문학의 연구
2018 .01
-
디지털 시대와 문학 산업
신영어영문학
2001 .08
-
단편 소설을 통한 문학과 영어교육 : 윌리엄 포크너의 「에밀리에게 바치는 장미」 가르치기
신영어영문학
2003 .08
-
조선후기 국문학과 한문학의 소통과 융합
국어국문학
2011 .08
-
문학교육과 문학에 대한 관점의 전환
국어교육연구
2007 .02
-
1930년대 신문 학예면과 문인기자 집단
한국현대문학연구
2002 .12
-
문학 영역의 교실 내 평가 정착을 위한 ‘실제적 평가’의 방향성
국어교육연구
2009 .08
-
근대일본문학의 시대적 상황과의 관련성에 대한 고찰
일본문화연구
2014 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-913-018677740