지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술대회자료
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2009.10
- 수록면
- 71 - 100 (30page)
이용수
이 논문의 연구 히스토리 (2)
- 이 논문의 후속연구가 궁금하신가요?
- 연관 학술논문 또는 학술발표를 통해 보다 발전된 연구결과를 확인하실 수 있습니다.
- 이 논문의 연구 히스토리 확인하기
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Corruption and problems in current society result from human’s greed and forfeiture moral consciousness that widespread in our society. For the future we should find a way to overcome the disrupting crisis circumstances. That’s why new philosophical reason and paradigm changes of science of public administration. This thesis found major factors of new paradigm to change in the doctrines of Hagok.
Administration reform in Gyeongse philosophy of Hagok is analyzed in a way of the modern political science. Reform plan that Hagok pursued is classified by political science. It is classified into five categories : adminstration structure, personnel, finance, local adminstration, and policy. Administrative structure includes strengthening of royal authority, the abolition of the faction, opening of discussion channel, and royal secret inspector displacement. Personnel adminstration is the abolition of the highest level state examination, enforcements of Tangpyeongchaek, the abolition of transmission by heredity, and selection of fit person from lowest class of people for higher positions. Finance is reform of land tax and reform of other associating tax laws. Local adminstration deals with merges and abolition of local districts, strengthening of local governors, and town leaders' function strengthening. Policy consists of the abolition of the status system, the equality of the four classes, acceptance of open-door policy and so on. Those things are compared here in the aspect of current adminstration. Administrative organization field is divided into mutual independence of the legislature of national power, administrative organization management, communication administration, and administrative control. Personnel administrations are appointment of public servants, man-power development, payment, and work and rules. Local administration deals with local autonomy and local council, administrative districts adjustment, and decentralization. Policy consists of land development, social welfare, socio-economic polarization settlement, bisexual equality and women status enhancement, and globalization.
Those reforms were considered very extreme and daring attempt so it was very hard to be accepted at that time. Even though those reforms could be a good opportunity to develop the nation. they evoked strong opposition by the privileged class and existing school such as Juja Confucianism and shunned by people those days. Briefly speaking Hagok School can be called “failed reform” in some parts.
We could make sure through this thesis that bold reform attempt required paradigm of social rules of the time changed.
So in the current times passed almost 3,000 years, the reform idea of Hagok School still be with us and it could be revived with revitalization of reform that goes well with globalization era
Next, I analyzed the relationship between Hagok and current public administration. The characteristics of Hagok are as follows ;
First, its characteristics, sprit, and directing points have been developed taking no notice of time and space. Second, improvement of administration has steady direction and directivity. Third, as times goes by, the doctrines of Hagok has been evolved and enhanced . Fourth, what doctrines of Hagok means is getting bigger and bigger.
In conclusion Korea’s traditional administrative reform that are discussed in Hagok is almost same with America’s modern administration and even more innovative. from the administrative point of view, Hagok is very similar to new public administration that added traditional political science to morality.
Administration reform in Gyeongse philosophy of Hagok is analyzed in a way of the modern political science. Reform plan that Hagok pursued is classified by political science. It is classified into five categories : adminstration structure, personnel, finance, local adminstration, and policy. Administrative structure includes strengthening of royal authority, the abolition of the faction, opening of discussion channel, and royal secret inspector displacement. Personnel adminstration is the abolition of the highest level state examination, enforcements of Tangpyeongchaek, the abolition of transmission by heredity, and selection of fit person from lowest class of people for higher positions. Finance is reform of land tax and reform of other associating tax laws. Local adminstration deals with merges and abolition of local districts, strengthening of local governors, and town leaders' function strengthening. Policy consists of the abolition of the status system, the equality of the four classes, acceptance of open-door policy and so on. Those things are compared here in the aspect of current adminstration. Administrative organization field is divided into mutual independence of the legislature of national power, administrative organization management, communication administration, and administrative control. Personnel administrations are appointment of public servants, man-power development, payment, and work and rules. Local administration deals with local autonomy and local council, administrative districts adjustment, and decentralization. Policy consists of land development, social welfare, socio-economic polarization settlement, bisexual equality and women status enhancement, and globalization.
Those reforms were considered very extreme and daring attempt so it was very hard to be accepted at that time. Even though those reforms could be a good opportunity to develop the nation. they evoked strong opposition by the privileged class and existing school such as Juja Confucianism and shunned by people those days. Briefly speaking Hagok School can be called “failed reform” in some parts.
We could make sure through this thesis that bold reform attempt required paradigm of social rules of the time changed.
So in the current times passed almost 3,000 years, the reform idea of Hagok School still be with us and it could be revived with revitalization of reform that goes well with globalization era
Next, I analyzed the relationship between Hagok and current public administration. The characteristics of Hagok are as follows ;
First, its characteristics, sprit, and directing points have been developed taking no notice of time and space. Second, improvement of administration has steady direction and directivity. Third, as times goes by, the doctrines of Hagok has been evolved and enhanced . Fourth, what doctrines of Hagok means is getting bigger and bigger.
In conclusion Korea’s traditional administrative reform that are discussed in Hagok is almost same with America’s modern administration and even more innovative. from the administrative point of view, Hagok is very similar to new public administration that added traditional political science to morality.
목차
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 하곡학의 행정학적 관련 주요 내용
Ⅲ. 霞谷學과 행정학의 관계성 분석의 틀
Ⅳ. 하곡학의 행정학적 의미 및 해석
Ⅴ. 결론: 하곡학의 행정학적 시사점
〈참고문헌〉
“하곡학의 행정학적 의미 찾기” 논평문
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
霞谷學의 행정학적 意味 찾기: 탐색적 접근
양명학
2009 .12
-
하곡 정제두의 『대학』 해석과 격물치지론
양명학
2018 .12
-
霞谷學과 茶山學의 사상적 연계 고찰을 위한 試論 — 四德⋅四端論을 중심으로 —
동양철학연구
2018 .01
-
Administration of Land Reform in Korea, 1949-52
Korea Journal
1984 .10
-
CHUNG CHEDU'S COMMENTARY ON THE GREAT LEARNING
양명학
2005 .02
-
程明道 『定性書』에 대한 霞谷의 이해
양명학
2005 .12
-
恒齋 李匡臣의 理氣論
양명학
2001 .08
-
학파적 시각에서 본 하곡학의 성격과 특징 - 국내외 연구성과 비교를 중심으로 -
양명학
2020 .03
-
하곡의 『맹자설』 〈호연장해〉의 구조와 그 윤리학적 함의
양명학
2020 .06
-
하곡霞谷 정제두鄭薺斗의 『중용』해석의 특징 : 하곡학의 사상적 경향성과 관련하여
국학연구
2002 .12
-
하곡 정제두의 이기설에 관한 연구(II)
동양철학연구
2004 .01
-
양명학으로 본 가정교육 : 霞谷의 「壬戌遺敎」ㆍ「家法」을 중심으로
양명학
2014 .12
-
鄭齊斗(霞谷) 陽明學의 硏究
한국학연구
1991 .12
-
Korean Public Administration in the Year 2000
Korea Journal
1972 .11
-
하곡 사유에서 주체의 의미와 근대성
양명학
2010 .04
-
하곡 정제두의 자녀교육 : 「名兒說」을 중심으로
양명학
2018 .08
-
하곡의 공부론을 통한 초등학교 인성교육 실천 방안
한국양명학회 학술대회 논문집
2015 .10
-
하곡학 관점에서 본 李匡臣과 李匡呂사상
양명학
2016 .08
-
17세기 後陽明學과 霞谷學의 定位
양명학
2005 .12
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2010-151-002332384