지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
From the analysis of “the slips of household registration system (戶籍簡)” by Liya(里耶), based on the concept of Hu(戶), Tongju(同居) and Shi(室) through Shang Yang(商?)’s the law of family system, I speculated the significant point at issue of “The history of Qin―Han”. These following phrases are my personal opinion that have been summarized from the speculation on “the slips of household registration system by Liya”, the most significant facts can be summarized in two ways. The first is that altough “simple family household(單婚核家族)”, in the form of family was universal, it was found out that the form of “extended family household(擴大家族)” has existed and this was not contradictive to the regulation from “the legal text of year 2, newly unearthed at Zhangjia-shan(張家山漢簡二年律令)” and The Sui Hudi Qin Bamboo(睡虎地秦簡). Furthermore, “Hu” which consists of more than dual core household from the “simple family household” cannot be understood as “Hu”.
For that case of the “extended family household” that “Shi” is connotated by the internal part of “Tongju”, I thought that nation should not refer “Shi” to “Hu” from the simple family household.
“The slips of household registration system(戶籍簡)” by L“iya(里耶)” clearly grasps the labour power in the unit of “Shi(室)” and the following fact is not contradictive to the regulation from “the legal text of year 2”, “newly unearthed at Zhangjia-shan”
I think that both simple family household or the “Tongju family(同居家族)” had the unit of Shi(室) to grasp the power of labor they had. Therefore, the concept of shi of “simple family household(單婚核家族)” and shi(室) of the Tongju(同居) family are the same. If there is a only difference on those two is that shi(室) of the Tongju(同居) had a written paper of family registration. The law of family of ShangYangBianFa(商?變法) said that if a person become a certain age, they had to have their own household. I thought the government just did this to take tax twice from a family. However, making another household was not about getting a tax twice form a family because I found out that if those family live together in a house, the government only took tax of a family.
For that case of the “extended family household” that “Shi” is connotated by the internal part of “Tongju”, I thought that nation should not refer “Shi” to “Hu” from the simple family household.
“The slips of household registration system(戶籍簡)” by L“iya(里耶)” clearly grasps the labour power in the unit of “Shi(室)” and the following fact is not contradictive to the regulation from “the legal text of year 2”, “newly unearthed at Zhangjia-shan”
I think that both simple family household or the “Tongju family(同居家族)” had the unit of Shi(室) to grasp the power of labor they had. Therefore, the concept of shi of “simple family household(單婚核家族)” and shi(室) of the Tongju(同居) family are the same. If there is a only difference on those two is that shi(室) of the Tongju(同居) had a written paper of family registration. The law of family of ShangYangBianFa(商?變法) said that if a person become a certain age, they had to have their own household. I thought the government just did this to take tax twice from a family. However, making another household was not about getting a tax twice form a family because I found out that if those family live together in a house, the government only took tax of a family.
#리야진간
#수호지진간
#이년율령
#호
#동거
#분가
#실
#분이령
#리야호적간
#里耶秦简
#睡虎地秦简
#二年律令
#戶
#同居
#分家
#室
#分异令
#里耶户籍简
#unearthed bamboo slips of Liya
#The Sui HuDi Qin Bamboo
#The legal text of year 2
#newly unearthed at Zhangjia-shan
#Hu
#Tongju
#Branch family
#Shi
#The law of Family system
#The slips of household registration system in Liya
목차
머리말
Ⅰ. 里耶秦簡의 戶籍簡의 類型別 特徵
Ⅱ. 秦의 「戶籍」과 「戶」ㆍ「同居」ㆍ「室」의 개념
맺음말 ― 商?의 「分異令」 再論
참고문헌 (1)
참고문헌 신청
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
사행로 관련 中對馬 지명 고찰 : 芳浦 · 瀨戶 · 船頭港 · 住吉灘 · 鴨瀨 · 船越浦 등을 중심으로
한일관계사연구
2018 .11
-
秦漢時代의 女性의 地位
중국사연구
2010 .01
-
韓國에서의 『張家山漢簡·二年律令』硏究
중국사연구
2008 .01
-
李朝蠶室考
한국학(구 정신문화연구)
1980 .12
-
高麗前期 戶等制와 농업경영규모
역사와 세계
1994 .06
-
戶籍이 말하는 민중의 삶
한국사 시민강좌
1998 .02
-
朝鮮後期의 養戶(上)
역사학보
1980 .03
-
朝鮮後期의 養戶 (下)
역사학보
1980 .06
-
里耶秦簡을 통해 본 秦代 縣廷의租稅징수
동양사학연구
2017 .09
-
京都大學 人文科學硏究所 ｢漢簡硏究班｣의 最近 秦漢史硏究
중국사연구
2009 .01
-
秦漢시기 詔書의 律令化
중국고중세사연구
2016 .11
-
17世紀初 丹城縣民의 身分構成-戶籍分析을 中心으로-
역사와 담론
1982 .06
-
Family System
Korea Journal
1977 .05
-
秦ㆍ漢初의 戶籍制度
중국고중세사연구
2011 .08
-
고려시대의 戶長
한국사학보
1998 .09
-
대구지역 한 양반가의 호적자료 검토 : 戶의 移居와 혈연결합을 중심으로
사학연구
2010 .06
-
張家山漢簡<二年律令》戶律(328簡~346簡)
목간과문자
2009 .12
-
雜戶 身分의 變遷과 그 性格
역사학보
1987 .09
-
조선왕조의 戶籍과 통치체계
동양사학회 학술대회 발표논문집
2015 .01
-
19세기 幼學戶의 구조와 성격-『丹城戶籍大帳』을 중심으로
대동문화연구
2004 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2010-910-002149048