지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Following the 3.1 Independence Movement, fervent hope and discourse for social change were sweeping across colonial Chosun of the 1920s. In July 1920, the most influential newspaper of the time, DongA Ilbo began to run a reader's column titled 〈Jayujong/Bell of Freedom/자유종〉, which became the place that demonstrated how newspapers readers, the consumers of ideologies, thought and got involved with social issues.
〈Jayujong〉) often found itself in midst of heated debates among readers, and such debates clearly manifested the educated public's perceptions and attitudes toward social issues of the time. Perceptions toward newly-imported thoughts such as "individuality" and "personality" particularly dominated the debate scene. Opinions on freedom of love and divorce, especially, were pitted against each other. However, the era's conception of individuality or personality were being adopted and consumed in an inconsistent manner. While personality and identity were being perceived as the latest ideological weapon attacking traditional family relationship, Korea's intellectuals were blatantly meddling in most private matters of people in the name of public interest.
This paradoxical attitude was made possible by consciousness of crisis according to the theory of social evolution. When a crisis found a nation on the verge of being extinct, there proliferated an ideology to rapidly evolve the society in order to survive as well as desire to quickly catch up with Japan and the West that successfully modernized their societies. The contradicting attitude of valuing individuality and personality but prohibiting personal boundary was born to such crisis and desire.
In addition, the flood of letters submitted to 〈Jayujong/자유종〉 shed light on the fact that the ideological environment of the 1920s were far more completed and volatile than were previously thought. Socialism and nationalism were beginning to take its root and boundaries that separated different ideologies were blurred and intersecting. That fueled the heated debates and sums up the ideology of the 1920s.
〈Jayujong〉) often found itself in midst of heated debates among readers, and such debates clearly manifested the educated public's perceptions and attitudes toward social issues of the time. Perceptions toward newly-imported thoughts such as "individuality" and "personality" particularly dominated the debate scene. Opinions on freedom of love and divorce, especially, were pitted against each other. However, the era's conception of individuality or personality were being adopted and consumed in an inconsistent manner. While personality and identity were being perceived as the latest ideological weapon attacking traditional family relationship, Korea's intellectuals were blatantly meddling in most private matters of people in the name of public interest.
This paradoxical attitude was made possible by consciousness of crisis according to the theory of social evolution. When a crisis found a nation on the verge of being extinct, there proliferated an ideology to rapidly evolve the society in order to survive as well as desire to quickly catch up with Japan and the West that successfully modernized their societies. The contradicting attitude of valuing individuality and personality but prohibiting personal boundary was born to such crisis and desire.
In addition, the flood of letters submitted to 〈Jayujong/자유종〉 shed light on the fact that the ideological environment of the 1920s were far more completed and volatile than were previously thought. Socialism and nationalism were beginning to take its root and boundaries that separated different ideologies were blurred and intersecting. That fueled the heated debates and sums up the ideology of the 1920s.
목차
Ⅰ. 머리말
Ⅱ. 〈자유종〉란의 변화와 내용
Ⅲ. 참여의 양상 - 투고자와 논쟁
Ⅳ. 〈자유종〉에 투영된 개인과 사회, 공과 사
Ⅴ. 맺음말
참고문헌
〈Abstract〉
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
[웅변교실] 웅변자의 자세
중국조선어문
2015 .11
-
토론 교육 관련 연구 흐름 분석을 통한 대학 토론 교육 의미 재고
수사학
2016 .12
-
‘논설’과 ‘서사’의 이분법적 구도를 넘어 -『자유종』을 통해 본 작가 이해조의 소설관-
한민족문화연구
2017 .01
-
국어과 토론교육의 의의와 발전 방향
국어교육연구
2013 .02
-
신문 기사를 통한 제19대 대통령 선거 후보자 TV 토론회 분석
수사학
2018 .04
-
교실 토론을 위한 토론 형식의 이해와 수업 적용 방안 연구
국어교육연구
2013 .02
-
토론 교육의 내용 설정 방향
국어교육연구
2013 .02
-
대학 토론교육의 문제와 해결방안 시론 : 토론교육의 목적을 중심으로
어문학
2009 .06
-
토론의 단계별 수업 방법 연구 : 반박 토론을 중심으로
어문론집
2008 .09
-
아카데미 토론 평가에 대한 재고찰 : 토론승패와 설득은 일치하는가
수사학
2011 .03
-
‘영성’, 에코페미니즘, 사냥
영미문학페미니즘
2006 .01
-
유아의 인성과 가정환경에 관한 연구
인문학논총
2001 .08
-
The Public Sphere and Democracy in Korea : A Debate on Civil Society
Korea Journal
1997 .12
-
유학사상을 통해서 본 인성의 준거 - 퇴계와 다산의 사상을 중심으로 -
한국사상과 문화
2018 .01
-
의사소통교육으로서의 ‘토론대회’ 사례 연구 : 숙명여대 교육경험을 중심으로
국어교육연구
2012 .02
-
韓中小說的近代性與前近代性 : 以李海朝之「自由鐘」與許地山之「女兒心」中心
동아인문학
2006 .12
-
학문 목적 한국어 학습자의 토론 불안 연구
이중언어학
2018 .01
-
중한 번역의 이데올로기 조정에 대한 소고
번역학연구
2008 .09
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2010-911-002849304