지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
"The Hwarangsegi(花郞世記)", which was composed around 700 A.D., still survived until the 12th century, but it has been disappeared until its two versions appeared in 1989 and in 1995 respectively. For their sudden appearances these two versions has been argued as the forgeries of "The Hwarangsegi".
The 1989 version has been judged as the excerpt of the 1995 version in that the former is very poor in its contents in contrast to the later one. But the judgement has been done on the quantities of the two versions, so the reliability of the judgment seems to be doubted. The later version revises the name of a famous Hwarang, Chae-won(體元), while his original name Ye-won(禮元) is kept in the former one. And the major episodes of some significances included in the later version had not been included in the former one. So these prove that the 1989 version is not an excerpt version of the 1995 version.
The later version has some traces of the arbitrary revision, not the mistakes, of the composer. And this proves that the keeper of this version Park Chang-wha was the composer of this version. So the later version is definitely forged one, and its base version, the 1989 version, has not much reliability as it is expected.
The 1989 version has been judged as the excerpt of the 1995 version in that the former is very poor in its contents in contrast to the later one. But the judgement has been done on the quantities of the two versions, so the reliability of the judgment seems to be doubted. The later version revises the name of a famous Hwarang, Chae-won(體元), while his original name Ye-won(禮元) is kept in the former one. And the major episodes of some significances included in the later version had not been included in the former one. So these prove that the 1989 version is not an excerpt version of the 1995 version.
The later version has some traces of the arbitrary revision, not the mistakes, of the composer. And this proves that the keeper of this version Park Chang-wha was the composer of this version. So the later version is definitely forged one, and its base version, the 1989 version, has not much reliability as it is expected.
목차
Ⅰ. 머리말
Ⅱ. ‘모본‘과 ‘발췌본‘의 수정 내용 검토
Ⅲ. ‘모본‘의 성격
Ⅳ. ‘발췌본‘의 성격
Ⅴ. 맺음말
〈Abstract〉
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
〈王慶龍傳〉異本考 : 李憲洪 所藏本을 대상으로
비평문학
2010 .12
-
송강가사의 선본 재고
열상고전연구
2018 .01
-
게임-인간version 1.04
인물과사상
2001 .06
-
Why So Many Bible Versions
성경원문연구
2003 .02
-
신자료 한문본 〈소대성전(蘇大成傳)〉의 발굴과 의미
한국학(구 정신문화연구)
2017 .09
-
〈완월회맹연〉의 이본현황과 서지적 특징
어문학
2011 .03
-
星湖 李瀷의 『藿憂錄』 4종 판본에 대한 고찰
태동고전연구
2014 .01
-
『孝經諺解』 이본에 대한 비교 연구
한국학(구 정신문화연구)
2012 .03
-
국문본 〈김영텰뎐〉의 이본적 위상과 특징
국어국문학
2011 .04
-
『햇볕 속의 건포도』의 핵심 주제 이해와 다양한 버전 선택 문제
신영어영문학
2016 .11
-
20세기 이전 중국어 성서 번역의 역사와 의의
한국기독교신학논총
2019 .10
-
M-B CDI - Korean 축약판 개발
음성과학
2008 .06
-
「효열지」의 이본 존재 양상과 구성적 특징
국학연구
2012 .06
-
『경민편(언해)』동경교대본과 규장각본 연구 - 한문 원문 및 구결의 차이 -
우리말글
2005 .04
-
개화기 소설의 한․중․일 번역 양상에 관하여－天路歷程의 고유명사 표기를 중심으로－
이중언어학
2012 .01
-
｢淸語老乞大新釋｣ 諸異本 간의 판본 비교 연구-선본 확정을 위한 기초 작업(2)-
우리말연구
2016 .01
-
필사본 ｢조생원전｣의 이본 유형과 담론 변이의 특징
한국문학논총
2020 .01
-
‘화성성역의궤’의 ‘한문본－한글본－국역본’ 비교 연구
어문학
2018 .12
-
이인직의 「혈의 누」 개작 양상 소고
어문학
2009 .09
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2010-911-002860069