지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
With the changes of times and the awareness of stakeholders surrounding business, whether or not companies appropriately respond to corporate governance or social responsibility concerning the environment and social issues is becoming a new standpoint of business assessment, which accordingly impacts considerably on the fiancing for the companies. So, now is the time for businesses to fully understand the point.
Today, companies not only feel pressure from the investors for the socially responsible investment but also they are being watched by the stockholders to fulfill the responsibility. They should be aware of the fact that they can't exist or grow if they neglect the duty before they even think of what benefits they could be given by performing the responsibility. Corporate ignorance of the duty might cause law suits against and a boycott by customers complaining about the services and products, and series of employees' legal actions against human rights abuse or gender discrimination. In addition, residents might be against the relocation of the ignorant company to their community, ending up more problems to the company. In particular, in the relationship with the investors, unclear attitude toward ESG only means a kickout from the capital market.
As everyone knows. however, SRI doesn't just function as a constraint from the corporate perspective. Companies striving for the social duty are suppose to win a high credit and fame in the society. As a consequence, they can seek better qualified employees and their stock prices will rise. If this preposition is right, consideration of the corporate social responsibility can bring about improved corporate value, naturally leading to boosting the competitiveness of the businesses. In this regard, companies should be aware of the importance of performing the social responsibility. Also, they should not consider it as loss but some smart strategies to enhance their value and competitiveness by keeping the governance transparent.
Today, companies not only feel pressure from the investors for the socially responsible investment but also they are being watched by the stockholders to fulfill the responsibility. They should be aware of the fact that they can't exist or grow if they neglect the duty before they even think of what benefits they could be given by performing the responsibility. Corporate ignorance of the duty might cause law suits against and a boycott by customers complaining about the services and products, and series of employees' legal actions against human rights abuse or gender discrimination. In addition, residents might be against the relocation of the ignorant company to their community, ending up more problems to the company. In particular, in the relationship with the investors, unclear attitude toward ESG only means a kickout from the capital market.
As everyone knows. however, SRI doesn't just function as a constraint from the corporate perspective. Companies striving for the social duty are suppose to win a high credit and fame in the society. As a consequence, they can seek better qualified employees and their stock prices will rise. If this preposition is right, consideration of the corporate social responsibility can bring about improved corporate value, naturally leading to boosting the competitiveness of the businesses. In this regard, companies should be aware of the importance of performing the social responsibility. Also, they should not consider it as loss but some smart strategies to enhance their value and competitiveness by keeping the governance transparent.
목차
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 기업의 사회적 책임의 실천촉진책
Ⅲ. 사회적 책임투자
Ⅳ. 미국에서 SRI 및 CSR을 둘러싼 법적 상황
Ⅴ. 결론
參考文獻
〈Abstract〉
참고문헌 (14)
참고문헌 신청
1. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 유희진 / 2008 / 기업의 사회적 책임(CSR)과 사회책임투자(SRI) / 상장협연구 (57)
3. [단행본] - 현대경제연구원 / 2009 / 經濟週評, 통권 제378호
4. [보고서] - 한국사회책임투자포럼(KoSIF) / / SRI in Korea 2009 Report
5. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 이연갑 / 2009 / ｢신탁법｣상 수탁자의 의무와 권한 / 선진상사법률연구 (48) : 30 ~ 52
6. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 伊吹英子 / 2007 / CSR経営戦略「社会的責任」で競争力を高める / 東洋経済社
3. [단행본] - 현대경제연구원 / 2009 / 經濟週評, 통권 제378호
4. [보고서] - 한국사회책임투자포럼(KoSIF) / / SRI in Korea 2009 Report
5. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 이연갑 / 2009 / ｢신탁법｣상 수탁자의 의무와 권한 / 선진상사법률연구 (48) : 30 ~ 52
6. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 伊吹英子 / 2007 / CSR経営戦略「社会的責任」で競争力を高める / 東洋経済社
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
기업의 사회적 책임(CSR)과 사회적 책임투자(SRI)에 관한 고찰
비교사법
2006 .12
-
SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY IN CORPORATE INVESTMENT
국제거래와 법
2012 .12
-
기업의 사회적 책임활동이 기업이미지에 미치는 영향 : 대기업과 중소기업의 비교
경영과학
2012 .03
-
일본 회사법상 CSR경영원칙 도입에 관한 논의
일감법학
2010 .01
-
중국 기업의 사회적 책임에 관한 사회책임위원회제도의 도입 검토
중국법연구
2010 .01
-
기업의 사회적 책임활동이 이익조정과 기업가치에 미치는 영향에 관한 실증적 연구 -한국과 중국 상장 기업을 중심으로-
산업경제연구
2020 .04
-
The Mediating Effect of Corporate Social Responsibility on Corporate Governance and Corporate Performance
산업경제연구
2013 .02
-
사회책임투자 활성화를 위한 제도개선 방안
기업법연구
2014 .03
-
공공 담론과 기업의 사회적 책임
사회와이론
2011 .05
-
기업의 사회적책임(CSR)과 사회책임투자(SRI)를 위한 선별지표 연구
경영교육연구
2011 .02
-
한국의 기업지배구조와 고용ㆍ노사관계
노동법논총
2009 .12
-
기업의 사회적 책임활동을 통한 이미지 형성이 기업성과에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구
대한경영학회지
2013 .04
-
기업의 사회적 책임에 대한 척도 개발
마케팅연구
2005 .06
-
금융회사의 지배구조개선과 신인의무이론의 접목가능성
은행법연구
2018 .01
-
기업의 사회적 책임활동이 기업이미지 및 성과에 미치는 영향
서비스경영학회지
2010 .06
-
사회연결망 분석기법을 활용한 기업지배구조와 기업성과 연구
경영과학
2012 .07
-
소비자의 기업평가에 있어서 기업과 소비자의 사회적 책임활동의 상호작용효과
경영과학
2012 .07
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2010-366-002432186