지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The purpose of Incoterms is to provide a set of international rules for the interpretation of the most commonly used trade terms in foreign trade.
Frequently, parties to a contract are unaware of the different trading practices in their, respective countries. This can give rise to misunderstandings, disputes and litigation. with all the waste of time and money that this entails. In order to remedy these problems, the International Chamber of Commerce first published in 1936 a set of international rules for the interpretation of trade terms. These rules were known as Incoterms 1936. Amendments and additions were later made in 1953, 1967, 1976, 1980, 1990 and presently in 2000 in order to bring the rules in line with current international trade practices.
Merchants often believe that Incoterms can solve most of the problems which may arise in practice. But Incoterms do not deal with transfer of property rights in the goods; relief from obligations and exemptions from liability in case of unexpected or unforeseeable events; or consequences of various breaches of contract, except those relating to the passing of risks and costs when the buyer is in breach of his obligation to accept the goods or to nominate the carrier under an F-term.
Incoterms determine when the seller has fulfilled his obligation to deliver the goods on time but no more. The consequences following from the seller's non-performance must be found elsewhere. Ideally, the simultaneous use of Incoterms and the ICC Model Contract should provide most of the answers required.
An increased replacement of paper documents by EDI is foreseen in the early 2000s through the use of BOLERO and similar systems. Since Incoterms reflect only the commercial practice most commonly used, the parties may wish to either depart from Incoterms or add provisions in order to obtain further precision. It must then be observed that the parties operate outside the scope of Incoterms and contract at their own peril; they should therefore carefully consider whether a departure from Incoterms is appropriate; an amended or added term should be carefully worded to avoided unintended consequences.
Frequently, parties to a contract are unaware of the different trading practices in their, respective countries. This can give rise to misunderstandings, disputes and litigation. with all the waste of time and money that this entails. In order to remedy these problems, the International Chamber of Commerce first published in 1936 a set of international rules for the interpretation of trade terms. These rules were known as Incoterms 1936. Amendments and additions were later made in 1953, 1967, 1976, 1980, 1990 and presently in 2000 in order to bring the rules in line with current international trade practices.
Merchants often believe that Incoterms can solve most of the problems which may arise in practice. But Incoterms do not deal with transfer of property rights in the goods; relief from obligations and exemptions from liability in case of unexpected or unforeseeable events; or consequences of various breaches of contract, except those relating to the passing of risks and costs when the buyer is in breach of his obligation to accept the goods or to nominate the carrier under an F-term.
Incoterms determine when the seller has fulfilled his obligation to deliver the goods on time but no more. The consequences following from the seller's non-performance must be found elsewhere. Ideally, the simultaneous use of Incoterms and the ICC Model Contract should provide most of the answers required.
An increased replacement of paper documents by EDI is foreseen in the early 2000s through the use of BOLERO and similar systems. Since Incoterms reflect only the commercial practice most commonly used, the parties may wish to either depart from Incoterms or add provisions in order to obtain further precision. It must then be observed that the parties operate outside the scope of Incoterms and contract at their own peril; they should therefore carefully consider whether a departure from Incoterms is appropriate; an amended or added term should be carefully worded to avoided unintended consequences.
목차
Abstract
Ⅰ. 문제제기
Ⅱ. 인코텀즈의 한계
Ⅲ. 무역거래조건의 합리적 이용
Ⅳ. 결론
참고문헌
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
Incoterms2000의 거래조건에 관한 연구
지역개발연구
2001 .02
-
Incoterms® 2010의 주요 개정내용 및 실무적 시사점
관세학회지
2010 .12
-
INCOTERMS 2000의 고찰
한국관세학회 학술대회
1999 .12
-
Incoterms 2010의 주요 개정내용에 관한 연구
무역연구
2010 .01
-
Incoterms 2010의 주요 개정내용 및 비엔나 협약과의 관계 연구
무역연구
2010 .01
-
IncotermsⓇ 2020 규칙의 주요 개정내용에 관한 연구
무역연구
2020 .01
-
INCOTERMS 2000과 합리적 적용 방안
관세학회지
2002 .08
-
Incoterms 2020의 주요 개정내용 및 실무상 유의점
무역상무연구
2019 .12
-
Incoterms 2010상의 통관의무와 보안정보 제공의무에 관한 연구
관세학회지
2011 .12
-
Incoterms 2010의 개정에 따른 주요내용과 유의점에 관한 연구
관세학회지
2010 .12
-
ICC 중재판정에서 Incoterms 적용의 해석문제
무역연구
2013 .01
-
Incoterms® 2010 Rules의 문제점과 대안
무역상무연구
2011 .08
-
INCOTERMS 2000에서 무역계약조건의 사용실태와 문제점에 관한 연구
한국무역학회 국제학술대회
2005 .12
-
개정 인코텀즈(Incoterms 2000)의 주요특징과 실무 적용상의 문제점 연구
무역학회지
2002 .02
-
우리나라 무역업계의 INCOTERMS 사용현황과 개정방향에 관한 고찰
무역상무연구
2009 .08
-
CIF 조건상 매도인의 부보의무에 관한 연구 -Incoterms 2010을 중심으로-
무역연구
2010 .01
-
IncotermsⓇ2020의 주요 개정 내용에 관한 고찰
무역연구
2019 .01
-
INCOTERMS 2000의 고찰
관세학회지
2000 .02
-
인코텀즈 2010의 주요 개정내용과 적용상의 유의점
무역상무연구
2011 .02
-
INCOTERMS 2010의 주요 개정내용에 관한 연구 : 2009. 9월 2차 초안을 중심으로
무역상무연구
2010 .02
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2010-381-003144066