지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
At its thirty-second session in 1999, the UNCITRAL had before it the requested note entitled "Possible future work in the area of international commercial arbitration." After concluding the discussion on its future work in the area of international commercial arbitration, it was agreed that the priority items for the working group should be conciliation, requirement of written form for the arbitration and enforceability of interim measures of protection, the Commission entrusted the work to the Working Group on Arbitration which held its thirty-second session at Vienna from 20 to 31 March 2000.
The Working Group discussed agenda item 3 on the basis of the report of Secretary General entitled "Possible uniform rules on certain issues concerning settlement of commercial disputes : conciliation, interim measures of protection, written form for arbitration agreement."
At its thirty-three session in 2000, the UNCITRAL had before it the report of Secretary General on agenda item 3 discussed by the Working Group.
The Working Group took note of statements to the effect that conciliation or mediation was being increasingly used for settling commercial disputes, that the use of such non-contentious methods of dealing with disputes deserved to be promoted and that the work of the Commission in the area should be geared to such promotion.
The Working Group discussed the issues relating to certain aspects of conciliation proceedings ; (1) Admissibility of certain evidence in subsequent judicial or arbitral proceedings ; (2) Role of conciliation in arbitration or court proceedings ; (3) Enforceability of settlement agreements reached in conciliation proceedings ; (4) Other possible items for harmonized treatment : a) Admissibility or desirability of conciliation by arbitrators b) Effect of an agreement to conciliate on judicial or arbitral proceedings c) Effect of conciliation on the running of limitation period d) Communication between the conciliator and parties ; disclosure of information e) Role of conciliator.
It was generally considered that decisions as to the form of the text to be prepared should be made at a later stage when the substance of prepared solutions would become clearer. However, it was noted that model legislative provisions seemed to be appropriate form for a number of matters proposed to be discussed in the area conciliation.
The UNCITRAL may wish to consider to the desirability of preparing uniform provisions on any of those issues concerning conciliation proceedings, possibly indicating whether future work should be towards a legislative text or nonlegislative text.
The Working Group discussed agenda item 3 on the basis of the report of Secretary General entitled "Possible uniform rules on certain issues concerning settlement of commercial disputes : conciliation, interim measures of protection, written form for arbitration agreement."
At its thirty-three session in 2000, the UNCITRAL had before it the report of Secretary General on agenda item 3 discussed by the Working Group.
The Working Group took note of statements to the effect that conciliation or mediation was being increasingly used for settling commercial disputes, that the use of such non-contentious methods of dealing with disputes deserved to be promoted and that the work of the Commission in the area should be geared to such promotion.
The Working Group discussed the issues relating to certain aspects of conciliation proceedings ; (1) Admissibility of certain evidence in subsequent judicial or arbitral proceedings ; (2) Role of conciliation in arbitration or court proceedings ; (3) Enforceability of settlement agreements reached in conciliation proceedings ; (4) Other possible items for harmonized treatment : a) Admissibility or desirability of conciliation by arbitrators b) Effect of an agreement to conciliate on judicial or arbitral proceedings c) Effect of conciliation on the running of limitation period d) Communication between the conciliator and parties ; disclosure of information e) Role of conciliator.
It was generally considered that decisions as to the form of the text to be prepared should be made at a later stage when the substance of prepared solutions would become clearer. However, it was noted that model legislative provisions seemed to be appropriate form for a number of matters proposed to be discussed in the area conciliation.
The UNCITRAL may wish to consider to the desirability of preparing uniform provisions on any of those issues concerning conciliation proceedings, possibly indicating whether future work should be towards a legislative text or nonlegislative text.
목차
Abstract
Ⅰ. 머리말
Ⅱ. 상사분쟁 해결수단으로 조정의 이용촉진
Ⅲ. 조정절차의 후속 사법 또는 중재절차에서 증거의 허용 여부
Ⅳ. 중재 또는 소송절차에서 조정인의 역할
Ⅴ. 조정절차에서 도달한 화해합의의 집행력
Ⅵ. 기타 조화된 취급을 위하여 논의 가능한 조정실무상 문제
Ⅶ. 맺음말
참고문헌
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
Conciliation in China
저스티스
1990 .08
-
민사조정법상 조정위원회의 구성과 역할에 관한 소고
법학논총
2019 .05
-
법원조정센터 운영현황과 발전방안에 대한 연구
법학논총
2015 .01
-
민사조정의 활성화와 사적자치
중재연구
2004 .01
-
금융 분쟁 조정 제도의 개선을 위한 입법 과제
입법과 정책
2013 .01
-
판결절차와 병행하는 민사조정절차의 효율적 운영방안
인권과 정의
2019 .01
-
행정쟁송에 있어서의 조정
법학연구
2011 .08
-
‘Mediation’과 ‘Conciliation’의 개념에 관한 비교법적 연구
중재연구
2009 .01
-
투자자-국가간 분쟁해결제도의 문제점과 대응방안
무역상무연구
2015 .12
-
개성공단에서의 남북상사중재위원회구성·운영에 관한 연구
중재연구
2014 .01
-
중재합의와 중재판정에 관한 소고
중재연구
2004 .01
-
현행 금융 분쟁 해결제도에 관한 법적 연구
일감법학
2011 .01
-
민사조정의 효력과 재심사유의 적용 : 대상판결 : 대법원2005. 6. 24.선고 2003다55936 판결(공 2005, 1248)
저스티스
2008 .12
-
인도 중재 · 조정법의 주요 특성에 관한 연구
중재연구
2012 .01
-
남북 상사중재기구의 운영과 실행과제
중재연구
2008 .01
-
국제상사중재에서 임의보전조치 논의에 관한 고찰 : UNCITRAL 국제상사중재모델법 제17조를 중심으로
무역학회지
2004 .10
-
중재법 개정과 환경분쟁 조정법상 중재의 활성화를 위한 고찰
국제법무
2019 .01
-
중국의 “중재와 조정의 결합” 제도와 시사점
무역학회지
2013 .08
-
중재에 있어서 법원의 역할
무역상무연구
2006 .05
-
프랑스의 ADR과 그 활용 현황에 관한 고찰
중재연구
2007 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2010-381-003144026