메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
조희문 (한국외국어대학교)
저널정보
한국라틴아메리카학회 라틴아메리카연구 라틴아메리카연구 Vol.21 No.3
발행연도
2008.9
수록면
49 - 84 (36page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
This article aims to analyse the core elements of the Brazilian foreign trade policy that play a central role in establishing foreign trade diplomacy. Since baron Rio Branco had established the Brazilian foreign policy, Brazil has followed traditionally regional isolationism based on South America, preferring in the same time multilateralism such as GATT/WTO instead of FTA or BITs. This foreign policy is very similar with the American foreign policy which has maintained isolationism based on Americas favouring multilateralism. However, as the US policy shifted from isolationism to bilateralism and regional economic integration establishing NAFTA in the early 90s, Brazil also has moved into the same direction, creating the MERCOSUR and celebrating several BITs. When Lula took power in 2003, he began to apply foreign trade policy more aggressive than Cardoso government. He had a very active role in creating Unasul based on the MERCOSUR, to maintain balance of power with the US leading FTAA negotiation through the EU FTA negotiation, and struggled to establish Brazil's negotiation status in Doha round leading agricultural exporting countries' interest. In fact, Brazil's trade policy has been influenced very strongly from macro-economic policy and industrial policy internally and foreign policy externally. Before 90s economic and industrial policies were import-substitution oriented to protect domestic industries. Moreover, a limited number of big companies had been involved in export-import trade which made foreign trade policy little influenced by domestic policies. Consequently, national congress made little reluctance to foreign trade policy of the federal government. However, this honeymoon relationship between legislative power and government broke up when liberal foreign trade policy began to produce negative impact on domestic industries, resulting foreign trade policy more influenced by domestic policies. After domestic market open, foreign market access became a most important goal of the Brazilian foreign trade diplomacy, considering that Brazilian agricultural products are very competitive internationally. This shows that Korea should consider very carefully the Brazilian foreign trade diplomacy when she analyses the possibility of FTA negotiation with MERCOSUR. In this aspect, it seems interesting that Korea should take initiative in knocking FTA negotiation with MERCOSUR as she has been negotiating with US, EU, Chile that are heavy competitors of agriculture export. With this competition environment in Korean market among foreign competitors, domestic consumers could have more benefits and korean products could get more foreign market access benefits.

목차

Ⅰ. 서언
Ⅱ. 권력분립과 통상정책
Ⅲ. 브라질의 통상정책
Ⅳ. 한-브라질 통상관계
Ⅴ. 결어
Abstract
참고문헌

참고문헌 (28)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2010-950-003096133