메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
전순신 (동아대학교)
저널정보
동아대학교 법학연구소 동아법학 東亞法學 第47號
발행연도
2010.5
수록면
153 - 182 (30page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
The principles of necessity and proportionality in jus ad bellum have a long history associated with the history of the regulation of the resort to force over the years.
In just war theory, necessity, in the sense that war is a last resort when other means have failed to achieve the object, is inherent, and proportionality was concerned with an assessment of whether the overall evil of resorting to war was balanced by the overall good that would be achieved.
In the latter part of the eighteenth century and in the nineteenth century, the resort to force became unregulated following the decline of just war theory. Nevertheless necessity and proportionality in jus ad bellum did not fall into entirely into disuse.
As for necessity, states in reality attempted to justify their forceful actions on a number of grounds. States may not have felt constrained to consider the proportionality in an overall sense that the resort to force would do more harm than good.
It was inevitable that owing to the demise of the just war theory and the growth of the modern system of nation states, there would be a gap for a time until states realized it as being in their interests to develop a new system to regulate the resort to force.
The practices, considering whether force was necessary and, if so, to what extent, gradually emerged. It was during this era that 1837 Caroline Incident occurred. Here appeared the modern requirements of legitimate self-defence, namely, necessity and proportionality. This formulation is also valid under the United Nations Charter system.

목차

Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 캐롤라인호 사건 이전의 필요성ㆍ균형성의 원칙
Ⅲ. 캐롤라인호 사건에 있어서의 필요성ㆍ균형성 원칙
Ⅳ. 캐롤라인호 사건 이후의 필요성ㆍ균형성의 원칙
Ⅴ. 결론
참고문헌
〈Abstract〉

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2012-360-003691258